both
Because its always changing and there are too many possible factors to make an accurate prediction.
so that we can prepare in case something really bad happens like an earthquake or something.
It is not scientifically valid to selectively ignore information that contradicts a prediction or change a prediction based on preconceived beliefs. It is important to consider all evidence, even if it goes against the initial prediction, in order to draw valid conclusions and refine future predictions. This approach is fundamental to the scientific method and ensures the integrity of the research process.
To determine if Luke's result supported his prediction, we would need to compare the actual outcomes of his experiment or observations with the expectations he set forth in his hypothesis. If the results aligned with what he predicted, then they would indeed support his prediction. Conversely, if the outcomes differed significantly from his expectations, it would suggest that his prediction was not supported. Without specific details on Luke's prediction and results, it's difficult to provide a definitive answer.
The flight attendances prediction was that they would land in new york in a hour.
my prediction for predictability in a sentence is very predictability
Dan Henderson vs. Rashad Evans Prediction
punk I asked you the question !
Should be added prediction regarding the joint investigation teams
By using it to make a prediction. (The most famous was the (relativity) prediction that gravity would bend light.)
to serve insane strive prediction
hypothesis
Try it raw.
Hypothesis.
To make an educatedguess
that you will fail