We should spend a minimum amount on space exploration, mainly using unmanned vehicles. We (the USA) can not afford to spend too much, because we are trillions of dollars in debt and there are too many more important programs that need the money more than space.
A historically informed perspective:One of the periods of greatest technological and economic advancement in the history of the US was between 1962 to 1972. This period of time coincides with the Gemini and Apollo programs. The US space program produced advancements in science across nearly all disciplines, many leading to improvements in the US economy and standard of living.It can only be surmised that continued, possibly even increased emphasis on space exploration would produce similar results today. To end a potential solution to huge problems in society because of those very same huge problems in society is incredibly foolish and short sighted.
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
Opinions on this topic vary. Some believe government investment in space exploration is vital for scientific discovery, technological advancement, and national security. However, others argue that funds could be better used for pressing issues on Earth such as poverty, healthcare, and education. Ultimately, the decision depends on political priorities and public support.
Yes, investing in space exploration can lead to valuable scientific discoveries, technological advancements, and economic benefits. Additionally, it fosters international collaboration and inspires future generations to pursue careers in science and technology.
I don't have the exact figure, but many countries allocate billions of dollars each year for space exploration and related activities. NASA's budget, for example, is around $22-23 billion annually.
NASA's annual budget for space missions varies but is typically around $22-25 billion. This budget covers a wide range of activities such as scientific research, exploration missions, technology development, and operations of the International Space Station.
Ocean Eploration
Neither, spend more money on real health care for people. People are more important than any of those explorations.
Opinions on this topic vary. Some believe government investment in space exploration is vital for scientific discovery, technological advancement, and national security. However, others argue that funds could be better used for pressing issues on Earth such as poverty, healthcare, and education. Ultimately, the decision depends on political priorities and public support.
Yes, investing in space exploration can lead to valuable scientific discoveries, technological advancements, and economic benefits. Additionally, it fosters international collaboration and inspires future generations to pursue careers in science and technology.
5 cents because they are too cheap and they use it to bomb Hitler.
no!
5 cents because they are too cheap and they use it to bomb Hitler.
$17.8 billion in FY2012
The United States must spend more money on space exploration.
yes they should cuz its not fair
No!
education, healthcare, military