It would be about 29.5 earth days. Or, precisely the same length of time as a full cycle of moon phases.
An observer on Earth sees a complete cycle of the phases of the moon in approximately one month because the moon takes about 29.5 days to orbit Earth. As the moon orbits, its position relative to the Earth and the Sun changes, causing the amount of sunlight reflected off its surface to vary, creating the different phases of the moon that we see from Earth.
If the Moon continued to revolve around the Earth while the Earth remained stationary, the cycle of moon phases would still occur, but the appearance of the Moon would change more gradually. The phases would progress at a consistent rate relative to the Moon's orbit, but the context of the Earth not rotating would alter the visibility of those phases for observers on Earth. As a result, the timing of when each phase is visible would be affected, potentially leading to longer periods of visibility for some phases.
During the Moon's revolution, an observer in space would see the moon, but would not be able to see it spin around. From far to the north, about the solar system, the moon would appear to make a squiggly
Your question is not complete; slowed doen by how much? right now it takes 29.5 earth days for the moon to make one complete revolution around Earth. So if the speed of moon slows down by half of what it is now, then it would take twice as much time as it take now revolve around Earth
Yes you would. Interestingly, the Earth would never rise or set - it would remain a prominent feature in the sky. Daylight on the Moon itself lasts roughly 2 weeks because of the rotational and orbital times of the Moon (both approximately 27.3 Earth days) and the Moon's orbital motion around the Sun.
An observer on Earth sees a complete cycle of the phases of the moon in approximately one month because the moon takes about 29.5 days to orbit Earth. As the moon orbits, its position relative to the Earth and the Sun changes, causing the amount of sunlight reflected off its surface to vary, creating the different phases of the moon that we see from Earth.
Yes. Unless the observer was on the back side of the moon, or on the opposite side of the earth from the moon, he/she could see the same phases that we see here on earth.
If the Moon continued to revolve around the Earth while the Earth remained stationary, the cycle of moon phases would still occur, but the appearance of the Moon would change more gradually. The phases would progress at a consistent rate relative to the Moon's orbit, but the context of the Earth not rotating would alter the visibility of those phases for observers on Earth. As a result, the timing of when each phase is visible would be affected, potentially leading to longer periods of visibility for some phases.
No, because the Earth does not orbit around Mars. The Moon only has phases because it orbits around Earth.
During the Moon's revolution, an observer in space would see the moon, but would not be able to see it spin around. From far to the north, about the solar system, the moon would appear to make a squiggly
To observe one complete cycle of the moon's phases in New York State, an observer would need to watch the moon over approximately 29.5 days, which is the time it takes for the moon to go from one new moon to the next. This cycle includes the new moon, first quarter, full moon, and last quarter phases. Clear skies and minimal light pollution would enhance visibility. Observing consistently each night is key to witnessing the gradual changes in the moon's appearance.
Your question is not complete; slowed doen by how much? right now it takes 29.5 earth days for the moon to make one complete revolution around Earth. So if the speed of moon slows down by half of what it is now, then it would take twice as much time as it take now revolve around Earth
Yes you would. Interestingly, the Earth would never rise or set - it would remain a prominent feature in the sky. Daylight on the Moon itself lasts roughly 2 weeks because of the rotational and orbital times of the Moon (both approximately 27.3 Earth days) and the Moon's orbital motion around the Sun.
The observer who cannot be explained by a geocentric model is one who sees the phases of Venus. In a geocentric model, Venus would always be positioned between the Earth and the Sun, preventing it from showing a full range of phases like those observed. The heliocentric model, which places the Sun at the center, accurately accounts for these phases as Venus orbits the Sun and can be positioned at varying angles relative to the Earth and Sun. This discrepancy was one of the key pieces of evidence that led to the acceptance of the heliocentric model.
Yes.
-- earth's orbital speed would be slightly less -- earth's orbital period (the "year") would be slightly longer -- every climate on earth would be less warm -- the period of the complete cycle of moon phases would be slightly shorter -- the length of the solar day would be slightly closer to the earth's period of axial rotation
The observer of a solar eclipse would typically be located on Earth, witnessing the event as the moon passes between the sun and Earth, causing either a partial or total eclipse. The specific location on Earth where the observer would be situated would depend on where the eclipse is visible from.