No. The U S did go to the moon. Regardless of other beliefs, there is proof that the landing on the moon wasn't fake.
The Apollos were watched, listened to, and tracked by people all over the world, both to and from the Moon, both friendly and unfriendly nations. it would be more than a little obvious if they just stayed in Earth orbit, as the antennas have to move to track the flight, and there is a lot of difference in the tracking needed to follow a spaceship taking 3 days to go to the Moon, and one taking 90 minutes to go around in circles! The Van Allen belt would only have killed the astronauts if they had stayed in the thick of them for a month, so they just shot on through in an hour or so, through the weakest, thinnest part. All told, none of the astronauts took even one percent of a lethal dose, as most radiation up there is particle radiation, which was stopped cold by their hull, thin as it was. In fact, a few sheets of newspaper would have done just as well... particle radiation is pretty puny.
The technology needed to fake the pictures, footage, and especially the samples, does not exist TODAY, let alone back then. You should see the lame special effects of Kubrick and Gerry Anderson, world's best Special Effects man of the time! The USSR, in the act of tracking their own lunar probe, could not possibly have failed to notice if Apollo 11 hadn't shown up on their screens and radios! Scientists all over the world have analyzed the Moon rocks. Not one has seen anything that would make it look like a hoax, and no scientist in the world has ever managed to duplicate a moon rock.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings badastronomy.com and clavius.org are the best places to learn about the misunderstandings that have made some people mistakenly believe there is a hoax. Others, I suspect, know better but are in it for the money.
The duration of A Trip to the Moon is 840.0 seconds.
There is no credible evidence to suggest that the moon landing was fake. The Apollo moon landings were extensively documented and verified by multiple sources, including photographs, videos, and samples brought back from the moon. The technology and resources required to fake a moon landing at the time would have been far more challenging than actually landing on the moon.
The Apollo moon landing in 1969 was real.
No, the moon is very real. The footsteps of Neil Armstrong, the first man to step foot on the moon, are on the moon.
the number 4
There is no evidence to suggest that the Samsung moon photos are fake.
The duration of A Trip to the Moon is 840.0 seconds.
There is no city on the moon.
A Trip to the Moon was created on 1902-09-01.
Yes, some travelers have encountered fake travel tickets when planning a trip.
There is no credible evidence to suggest that the moon landing was fake. The Apollo moon landings were extensively documented and verified by multiple sources, including photographs, videos, and samples brought back from the moon. The technology and resources required to fake a moon landing at the time would have been far more challenging than actually landing on the moon.
There is no official "Samsung Moon Zoom" feature. It is likely a fake or misleading claim.
no they were not
what a pointless question, the number four is real, it is fake, it is on the moon, and it is not in his face, it is in yours.
N.A.S.A did not fake the moon landing at all.
For landing missions, it would have been the third moon landing. For the Apollo program as a whole, it was the 5th trip to the moon.
The Apollo moon landing in 1969 was real.