Establishing a moon station would enable humans to enjoy less gravity.
different people have different reasons
There are currently no plans to return to the moon.
The US responded to the USSR sending a man to space by increasing funding for their own space program, NASA, and accelerating their efforts to send a man to the moon. This led to the Apollo program and ultimately, the US successfully landing the first humans on the moon in 1969.
As of now, no women have landed on the moon. The first and only humans to set foot on the moon were all men as part of the Apollo missions. NASA is actively working towards sending the first woman to the moon in the near future through the Artemis program.
Armstrong went to the Moon in 1969
At this time there is no current mission to send humans to live on the moon.
different people have different reasons
There are currently no plans to return to the moon.
India has 1 satellite orbiting the moon. They plan on sending another satellite along with a rover in 2012. They are the 5th country to successfully place a satellite in the moon's orbit. India is also planning a manned moon mission around 2020. If successful, they will be the 3rd country to send humans to the moon, following the USA and probably China (who are planning a manned moon mission around 2016).
The US responded to the USSR sending a man to space by increasing funding for their own space program, NASA, and accelerating their efforts to send a man to the moon. This led to the Apollo program and ultimately, the US successfully landing the first humans on the moon in 1969.
As of now, no women have landed on the moon. The first and only humans to set foot on the moon were all men as part of the Apollo missions. NASA is actively working towards sending the first woman to the moon in the near future through the Artemis program.
No , manned missions to the moon are not ongoing .
Yes, apart from earth. (Technically the moon is not an actual planet, so technically the only planet humans have been on is Earth). There is talk of sending a manned mission to mars, though it seems unlikely.
Armstrong went to the Moon in 1969
No, because there are currently no spacecraft capable of sending astronauts that far into space. Plus, they would need lots of food and fresh water.
11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.11 more men set foot on the Moon after Neil Armstrong. He did so in 1969. The last time anyone was on the Moon was in 1972. It would be far more expensive now, and after sending people to the Moon, scientists wanted to do other things and so there have been many different things doen since then, but people may go to the Moon again sometime.
The earth would drown in sea water so the humans would you know... The moon creats tides so no tides would drown the eath or dry it out