Thorne claimed that the presence of gravitational waves provides strong evidence for the theory of general relativity and the dynamics of black hole mergers. His assertion was supported by the groundbreaking detection of gravitational waves by the LIGO observatory in 2015, which matched predictions made by Einstein's theory. This detection not only confirmed the existence of these waves but also offered insights into the behavior of massive celestial bodies during their collisions. The data collected from these events provided a tangible link between theoretical physics and observable phenomena.
Study of celestial bodies or astronomical objectsadditional and attempting to predict the future or other outcomes from this data. Not concepts supported by science.
Edwin Hubble's discovery of red shift demonstrated that galaxies are moving away from each other, providing evidence for the expanding universe. This discovery supported the Big Bang theory and fundamentally changed our understanding of the universe's structure and evolution.
Why, the telescope, of course! Using his telescope, Galileo was able to make observations of the heavens in a way no one else was able to before.
While some people believe that the full moon can affect human behavior, there is no scientific evidence to support this claim. The idea that the full moon causes people to go crazy is likely just a myth or superstition. Other factors such as stress, sleep patterns, and environmental changes may play a bigger role in influencing behavior.
Inferences are clues or evidence that are used to make educated guesses about things that cannot be directly observed. These guesses are based on reasoning and logical interpretations of available information.
According to Toulmin's model of argumentation, a good argument should consist of a claim, evidence to support the claim, reasoning that connects the evidence to the claim, and acknowledgment of potential counterarguments. This structure helps to strengthen the argument and make it more convincing and well-supported.
A claim in an essay is the main argument or point that the writer is trying to make. It is typically presented in the thesis statement and serves as the central focus of the essay. The claim should be supported by evidence and reasoning throughout the essay to persuade the reader of its validity.
A good claim that states your opinion/fact, strong evidence that supports your claim, and reasoning that shows a link between the claim and evidence. The most important parts, in my opinion, are the reasoning and evidence, but the claim is important too. After all, the claim is the base. The evidence is the top, and the reasoning is all the details that make it interesting and worthy of of attention.
What evidence does Meacham provide to support his claim that the “American dream may be slipping away”? Is this evidence sufficient to make this claim? Explain.
An argument should present a clear point of view or claim supported by evidence and reasoning. It should anticipate and respond to counterarguments, showing why the claim is valid and persuasive. Ultimately, the goal is to convince the audience of the validity of the argument.
Well make sure you have evidence of this opinion of yours, that would be the key factor for me.
No, it is not a preposition. The word claim can be a verb, or a noun, also as an adjunct or adjective (claim ticket, claim form).
An argument in persuasion is a set of reasons or evidence used to convince someone of a particular point of view or to take a specific action. It typically includes a claim or thesis supported by evidence and reasoning to make a persuasive case. The goal of the argument is to sway the audience's opinion or behavior through logical reasoning and emotional appeals.
Her sister is Ariana Iris-monighe thorne
Oh honey, writing a good CER for a conclusion is simple. Just state your claim loud and proud, back it up with evidence that packs a punch, and then throw in some sassy reasoning to tie it all together. Don't forget to sprinkle in a dash of your personality to really make it pop. And there you have it, a CER that's as fabulous as you are!
No. Pseudoscience is the use of scientific sounding terminology to make unscientific or ascientific concepts sound scientific. Pseudosciences such as phrenology are not supported by scientific evidence.
evaluate the evidence used to support it