The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
None in reality - BUT the probability of having moons goes up as mass of the central planet rises.
The planet Mercury has no moons.
Jupiter has the highest number of known moons. The figure currently stands at 63, though more could be discovered.
The planet Jupiter has the most known moons of any planet in our solar system, with 63 (as of 2011). Saturn has 62 known and named moons, but may have more depending on the classification of the many small bodies within its ring system.
In our solar system, the planet Jupiter has the most (63) confirmed moons, though that # may go up in the future after closer observations of Jupiter.
no connection between those 2things
There is no direct connection between the mass of a planet and the number of moons it has. Mars is less massive than Earth but has twice as many moons as does Earth. Jupiter is more massive than either Mars of Earth and has many more moons that either of them.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
The general tendency is for a more massive planet to have more moons. However, the number of moons will also depend on the planet's previous history, so the situation is not entirely straightforward.
There is no direct connection between the mass of a planet and the number of moons it has. Mars is less massive than Earth but has twice as many moons as does Earth. Jupiter is more massive than either Mars of Earth and has many more moons that either of them.
The mass of a planet can influence the number of moons it has through its gravitational pull, which can capture moons as they orbit. Larger planets with stronger gravitational fields are more likely to have more moons. Additionally, the size of the planet can also affect the amount of material available for moon formation, potentially leading to more moons.
The mass of a planet has nothing to do with its number of moons. For instance, Mars' mass is much less than that of Earth, yet Mars has two moons (Deimos and Phobos) while the Earth has one. (Luna)
None in reality - BUT the probability of having moons goes up as mass of the central planet rises.