thunderbolts
When Odysseus says that no man can avoid the eye of Helios, he is referring to the all-seeing nature of the sun god Helios. In Greek mythology, Helios was believed to see and know everything that happens on Earth. Therefore, Odysseus is acknowledging that it is impossible to escape the attention and wrath of Helios if one commits a transgression against him, such as the actions of his crew in Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey."
She really didn't explain things in nature. She explained the human endeavor of hunting. She was the goddess of animals so you could say she explained animals. She and her twin brother Apollo spread plagues through cities so you could also say they explained that.
Phenomena is plural for phenomenon meaning A fact, occurrence, or circumstance that is observed or observable. Fog is a natural phenomenon in nature meaning exactly that. It is a natural occurrence that can be observed in nature. Think of it like a rainbow, wave on the ocean, and or even a volcano! These are natural occurrences that amaze us and can or have been observed. Fog is amazing to see. For example, you can stand right in the middle of fog and yet you can really feel it. All you feel is the chilled crispness of it. Fog is a natural phenomenon in nature!
That is a rather broad question. I would assume that it is a penomenon that occurs in space. by the dictionary a phenomenon is: 1. a fact, occurrence, or circumstance observed or observable: to study the phenomena of nature. 2. something that is impressive or extraordinary. 3. a remarkable or exceptional person; prodigy; wonder. So in summary I would say that a space phenomenon is: something cool that happens in space.
A cross of light over the moon is typically a phenomenon caused by atmospheric conditions or optical illusions. It is not a common occurrence in nature and does not hold any specific mystical or spiritual significance.
The photoelectric effect does not support the wave nature of light. This phenomenon can only be explained by the particle nature of light, as described by Albert Einstein in his theory of photons.
Yes, the photoelectric effect is a phenomenon that does not support the wave nature of light. It demonstrates particle-like behavior of light as photons transfer their energy to electrons in a material, causing them to be emitted. This phenomenon cannot be explained using a wave model of light.
Nature could be explained through abstract reasoning and experimentation.
One phenomenon that does not support the quantum nature of light is the photoelectric effect. In this effect, light behaves as a stream of particles (photons) rather than a classical wave, showing that light can only be explained fully by quantum mechanics.
CREDIT
When Odysseus says that no man can avoid the eye of Helios, he is referring to the all-seeing nature of the sun god Helios. In Greek mythology, Helios was believed to see and know everything that happens on Earth. Therefore, Odysseus is acknowledging that it is impossible to escape the attention and wrath of Helios if one commits a transgression against him, such as the actions of his crew in Homer's epic poem "The Odyssey."
basic in nature
in the magic island
It shows that light behaves as a wave phenomenon. Interference cannot be explained using a particle theory. http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/waves/Lesson-3/Interference-of-Waves
nature could be explained though abstract reasoning an exper........
Yes. Tornadoes are a type of natural phenomenon.
In very brief, Daedalus was a skilled craftsman from Crete, who created the labyrinth for King Minos in Knossos. He and his son, Icarus, were imprisoned by King Minos, and Daedalus crafted wings out of wax and feathers so that the two could escape. Against his father's warnings, Icarus dared to fly too close to the sun, thus melting his wings, and fell to his death. As for Phaeton, his mother was a mortal from Greece, and his father was the sun god Helios. In order to prove his semi-divine blood, Phaeton demanded from Helios the use of his chariot, which in Greek Mythology, was the sun itself, drawn by fire-breathing horses. Helios resisted at first, but reluctantly acquiesced. Upon taking the reins, Phaeton lost control of the chariot, and the steeds drew the sun close to the Earth, resulting in mass evaporation of the planet's oceans, lakes, et cetera. To avoid a major conflagration, and thus the end of life on the planet, Zeus struck Phaeton down with a lightning bolt, killing him. In both cases the main characters are victims of hubris and overzealous ambitions. Icarus did not heed his father's warnings and flew too close to the sun; symbolically speaking, he dared to defy the limitations of mere mortals and challenged the gods. Similarly, Phaeton demanded to control the sun -- or to be god-like -- and failed; although he was semi-divine, the feat was no match for feeble mortality. The moral of both stories is that when humanity attempts to control nature, or to be like gods, the end result is its own destruction (think about the Atom bomb as a modern day example of this). Do we, as the human race, acknowledge, accept, defy or reject our natural limitations?