0
What philosopher believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly she be trusted?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Rene Descarte believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly can be trusted.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did Cupid didn't like Psyche to see him?
It was a test to see how much she trusted him.
When the theory that the sun goes around earth was replaced with the theory that earth goes around the sun this as an example of a?
To say that there was once a "theory" that the Sun went around the Earth is to give it too much merit; isn't it OBVIOUS that the Sun goes around the Earth? After all, can't you SEE, with your OWN TWO EYES, that the Earth is flat, and stationary, and that the Sun, Moon and Stars all rise and fall each day? In fact, many things that we "know" are "obvious" are wrong. Often, in the realm of economic and political theories, DANGEROUSLY wrong. We are deceived by our own senses into believing that the Earth is flat, when it is round; that the Earth is stationary, when it is both orbiting the Sun and spinning like a top, and that the Moon goes around the Earth. OK, bad example; the Moon really DOES go around the Earth. But early scientists like Aristarchus of Samos figured out that the Earth was round, and went around the Sun, over 2400 years ago. Arguing from the evidence of his own senses, Aristotle (who may have been the wrong-est man ever to live!) persuaded the elite of Greek society, and the elites of all other societies for the next two thousand years, that only their senses, rather than their intellect, was to be trusted. This is called the "appeal to authority", a fallacy still being perpetrated on humanity today.
What does passter mean?
Passter Password ManagerFree secured password manager which minimizes the risks and maximizes the browsing comfy. Passter encrypts and protects your passwords, automatically fills in the login forms, helps you by generating strong passwords and changing website passwords, removes the burden of remembering complex passwords and reduces the chance of identity theft. Passter is Google Chrome extension, which means it runs inside the browser. This approach creates a great user experience while surfing the web.Safer, Secured and ProtectedPasswords, forms and all other browsing information are always saved encrypted in the password repository (local browser or your Google Doc account) using latest security protocols. Passter protects you against phishing, fraud, and malware.Self-AccountabilityYou choose and monitor the password repository. Passter only acts as broker and there is no need to open a Passter account. Also Passter doesn't send or save information and passwords to anyone other than the repository.Trusted Online ModePasster introduces your Google Account as a great password repository. This enables all the benefits and high security demands from such password management application:Passwords are stored in Google Documents Server (using SSL protocol), one of the largest and most protected servers in the world. You also enjoy their high availability and their strong hardware.Google is a trusted company. No need to open Passter account or relay on other 3rd party servers.Best of all, Passter is using the OAuth protocol. This means that Passter doesn't require from you to provide any Google Account credentials. It simply redirects you to a Google Server page using the SSL protocol for authentication and authorization.Single Point of LoginsNo need to synchronize data between password repositories. Passter reduces the efforts by suggesting strong passwords, auto filling the logins form and monitoring your password policy for eliminating the highest security risk in these days: identity theft and privacy lost. FREE!!!Free to use by any user and for any purpose. Also you are not forced to open any account or fill forms.
Astronomers generally agree that the matter in the sun and its planets came from an?
No two astronomers (secular) agree on the origin of any matter. However Creation scientists agree that God created everything ex-nihilo (from nothing). Science continues to try and see beyond what they refer to as the big bang. However their techniques they use in order to track back that far into history supposedly bring them to what they believe to be .1111 (or something) seconds after the big bang. Secular Science has been baffled by "the beginning of the universe" for years because they have no solid evidence on which to base their findings. Everything is postulated and supposedly correct all so they can continue to move forward even if it is in the wrong direction. A beginning based on the Bible's account found in Genesis 1 is the only feasible story about the creation of our known universe. And by feasible, I mean the only source that can be trusted for absolute truth. Some fallacies for you to look into regarding an evolutionary point of view on the beginning of the world would in the fossil records including carbon dating (newly created rocks from active volcanoes being dated millions of years old using carbon dating even though their creation was observed in a much shorter span of time.) And also evolutionary records having no physical proof of any species (not just human) evolving from one kind to another (such as lizard to bird which is constantly portrayed by attempts of artist renderings on dinosaurs as certain ones having feathers.) I encourage you to research this yourself. Realize that Evolution is still called "The THEORY of Evolution". Find out for yourself which stories of creation can actually hold up against a valid argument. You can start at answersingenesis.com Though it is a Christian site they do not simply throw scripture at you to prove their point they actually approach each issue with practised science and give straight answers. Another view The misinformation above is staggering in its ignorance. Evolution is a fact, recognised not only by secular scientists but also by organised religions, including the Catholic church. The theories concerned are the reasoned attempts to explain the process. Failure to see the difference show a lack of intellectual capacity and rigour. In addition there is evidence of the big bang, both physical and theoretical. One theory has the capacity to describe the universe at 10-43 seconds after the big bang (not .1111 or something). There is no evidence whatsoever for the creation of the universe by a deity. It is indeed fortunate that the vast majority of people that hold strong spiritual beliefs have a little more integrity and scepticism than the views of fundamentalist above. (Those views are, perhaps, proof that evolution is not universal in all cases) People used to believe the earth was flat, well some of us have learned a thing or two since then, even if others find that difficult.
Why do all the planets go around the sun in the same direction and why do they lie on a relativrly flat plane?
The newly-formed sun pulled interstella debris into orbit around it because of gravity. The 'dust' settled into a disc around the centre-line of the sun, and each planet condensed out of the dust. This meant that the planets are more-or-less on a similar plane to each other.
What philosopher believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that only what can be seen clearly distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that what only can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that only that can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that only what can be seen and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believes that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trust?
Rene Descartes believed that only what can be seen clearly and distinctly should be trusted.
What philosopher believed that only what can see clearly and distinctly should be trusted?
Rene Descartes
What is the correct definition of the word credibility?
Credibility refers to the quality of being believable or trustworthy, often associated with someone's reputation for honesty and reliability. It can also refer to the extent to which something can be considered authoritative or accurate.
Polonius's instructions to Reynaldo demonstrate his belief that?
Clearly he believes that Laertes cannot be trusted. And this seems fair, since certainly Polonius cannot be trusted.
With who moved from Mecca to Medina Muhammad?
His family and those few that believed and trusted in him
What is the different attitudes and traits of Albert Einstein?
Trusted science and believed in GOD
