a) A parallax was expected, according to theory.b) None was detected. The problem here is that even the closest star (apart from the Sun) are so far away that their parallax is less than one arc-second - i.e., less than 1/3600 of a degree, and therefore hard to measure.
Yes, objects that are farther away than others will exhibit less parallax. Parallax is the apparent change in position of an object when viewed from different perspectives. The closer an object is, the greater its parallax when viewed from different angles.
Earth isn't a star and doesn't (can't) have a parallax, becuse we use Earth's orbit as a baseline to measure parallax.
Parallax is the apparent change in postion of an object when looked at from two different places. Astronomers use parallax to find how far away nearby stars are.
The distance to the star can be calculated using the formula: distance (parsecs) = 1 / parallax angle (arc seconds). Plugging in the given parallax of 0.20 arc seconds, the distance to the star would be 1 / 0.20 = 5 parsecs.
The scientist demonstrated the method of parallax to calculate the distance of celestial bodies.
Jules Verne
a) A parallax was expected, according to theory.b) None was detected. The problem here is that even the closest star (apart from the Sun) are so far away that their parallax is less than one arc-second - i.e., less than 1/3600 of a degree, and therefore hard to measure.
Film Camera is the correct answer.
Isaac Newton.
He was a scientist who explained the malthusian theory
sir issac newton
There is no such way to avoid parallax error, you just have to be careful.. :)
parallax is a planet
the scientist were jealous of him
Jules Verne
The scientist solved his problem by doing it over again several times. Also by constructing a hypothesis.