The way a star burns it's fuel does in fact change it. The star will die when the fuel becomes too dense depending on the size of the star. For instance, if our sun was full of lead, it would explode, and we would cease to exist.
The Sun uses the energy produced from converting hydrogen into helium through nuclear fusion to generate heat and light. If the Sun had no helium, it wouldn't be able to sustain this fusion process, leading to a lack of energy production and a collapse in the Sun's structure. Helium plays a crucial role in the fusion reactions that occur in the Sun, contributing to the high temperatures and pressures required to sustain nuclear fusion.
That would be the hydrogen in the sun. The second most plentiful substancein the solar system would be the helium in the sun, being the fused hydrogen.
Stars fuse hydrogen into helium, and then fuse the helium into carbon. For a star to have more than about 50% helium, we know that the star has already burned up half of its natural fuel, and that the end is near.
Im no astrophysicist but an older star would consume more of its hydrogen over time in comparison to helium through its fusion process. Over time concetrations would change resulting in a higher helium to hydrogen ratio.
All stars are composed mostly of hydrogen. The star fuses hydrogen into helium. The helium cannot escape the start until the end of the star's life cycle. Thus a middle-aged, medium sized star will be comprised of hydrogen and helium. As the star ages, it may start to fuse helium at its core into carbon. At this point it will likely expand into a red giant star, and thus would no longer be yellow.
Hydrogen is lighter than helium. So hydrogen balloon will float better than helium.
There is one thing that is relative to both helium and hydrogen. Both of these are a type of chemical.
Yes. I would go with helium if you can get it. Hydrogen can explode.
Essentially yes; the sun's energy comes from nuclear fusion with hydrogen being converted to helium.
An equal mass of helium would contain fewer atoms compared to hydrogen, as each helium atom is four times heavier than a hydrogen atom. This is because the atomic mass of a helium atom is roughly four times that of a hydrogen atom.
Helium was more suitable but not available in Germany before the war.
I am unsure what you mean by the formula for Hydrogen and Helium because both are an element, not a compound and you would generally not have a formula for an element. However, I can tell you that the difference between the formula for Hydrogen gas and Helium gas if; Hydrogen gas: H2 H-H Helium gas: He Hope this helps
That would happen after it loses a certain amount of helium.
No, because the density oh helium is bigger (x 10).
They are gases at room temperature.
The replacement of hydrogen in blimps with helium is not based on the gas laws but rather on the fact that hydrogen is highly flammable whereas helium is entirely non flammable. In fact based on the gas laws hydrogen would actually be better for blimps because its has lower molecular mass and is therefore less dense than helium.
I'm guessing here, but I think you are asking about nuclear fusion. in that case, what happens when a hydrogen atom hits a helium atom? Not much. Fusion would require two hydrogen atoms. What would happen when two hydrogen nuclei hit together? If the pressure and temperature were high enough, the two hydrogen nuclei would fuse, creating an atom of helium, along with a high explosive force and an extremely high release of heat.