answersLogoWhite

0

Scientists' claims should be questioned when they lack sufficient evidence, rely on flawed methodology, or contradict established knowledge without robust justification. Additionally, claims should be scrutinized if there are potential conflicts of interest or if they are not subjected to peer review. Healthy skepticism is essential in science to ensure accuracy and reliability in findings. Ultimately, questioning claims promotes critical thinking and advances scientific understanding.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

4mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Astronomy

Is astrology scientific?

Astrology is not considered scientific by the mainstream scientific community, as it lacks empirical evidence and is based on beliefs rather than reproducible experiments. Scientists emphasize the importance of relying on data and testable hypotheses to validate claims, which astrology does not adhere to.


Where should scientist look for the most recent and reliable information?

A scientist should look for the most recent and reliable information from their fellow scientists. The best way to get recent information is to go to the people who have most recently gotten it.


Who is bob lazar?

Bob Lazar is a physicist who claimed to have worked on reverse-engineering alien spacecraft at a secret government facility near Area 51. He gained public attention in 1989 when he shared his story with investigative journalist George Knapp. His claims have been met with skepticism and controversy, with some believing him to be a government disinformation agent while others consider him to be a whistleblower exposing UFO-related secrets.


After the experiment scientists organize and do what with the data-?

After the experiment, scientists organize and analyze the data.


What do scientists say about creation?

The vast majority of scientists say that creation, as opposed to current biological, physical, chemical and astronomical models, is pseudoscience with a religious and political agenda.When we say "majority", we don't just mean 101 to 100. We're talking 999 out of every 1000. Some creation supporters have compiled lists of a few hundred "scientists" which support it. Most of these "scientists" are unqualified; most of the remainder have very little actual qualification. Of the few others, their opinion is based on religious (and not purely scientific) grounds.There are hundreds of thousands of scientists who would attest that their work and research indicates current science to be correct, and creationist claims to the contrary are unfounded, based in misapplication, misunderstanding, and speculation about facts.Quite simply, scientists (as a group) say that creationism is wrong/false/incorrect/fake.ANSWERYou will find that anti-creation scientists are over-represented in the field of Biology despite overwhelming modern evidence and research otherwise by other scientists in other fields such as ENTROPY. [Not old parroted "facts" and opinions passed off as facts but since discredited].Anyway, most scientists couldn't care less - it's just the squeaking wheel that gets the most grease.

Related Questions

Can a scientific law be questioned?

Yes, because half of all scientists are liars and should be able to use your brain and question their laws and/or theories.


Why did famous scientists come to see Mary Anning?

People questioned if she was a good scientist


How long do you have to report items stolen?

The theft should be reported as soon as the theft is discovered. Otherwise late reports may be questioned by insurance companies or by the police in any future actions or claims relating to the theft.


Should Claims about single individuals should be treated as an Equivalent claims a Negative claims a Affirmative claims or none of the them?

Claims about single individuals should be treated as A claims or E claims. pg 254 in your textbook


What is important so that scientists can check one another's claims?

Communication. :)


How did the ruling philosophies of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin compare?

Both believed that anyone who questioned the government should be harshly punished.


Claims that appear to be pseudoscience should be?

Such claims should be treated with great skepticism.


Can a child have an attorney present while being questioned by Florida Division of Human Resources?

Yes, Children should always have an attorney present while being questioned.


Why should you consider yourself fit to be hire?

When I was questioned about the salary I would expect.


Why did scientists question Avery's findings?

Scientists questioned Avery's findings because they had difficulty accepting that DNA, which was previously thought to be a simple molecule, could be responsible for genetic inheritance. Additionally, Avery's experiments were considered too simple and lacked detailed mechanistic explanations to convince some scientists of his conclusions.


How would a scientist respond to another scientist who questioned her conclusion?

They would basically just answer the question - usually science tests are conducted by different scientists (that is why they share their conclusions).


Why did monarchs of this time believe their authority should never be questioned?

they ruled by divine right