Nova net: Thales
She really didn't explain things in nature. She explained the human endeavor of hunting. She was the goddess of animals so you could say she explained animals. She and her twin brother Apollo spread plagues through cities so you could also say they explained that.
The German climbers surmised that their discovery was significant, potentially revealing new insights about the region's geography or history. They believed it could lead to further exploration and understanding of the area, possibly uncovering artifacts or features that had been previously unknown. Their excitement was driven by the possibility of contributing to the scientific community and enhancing knowledge about the mountain landscape they encountered.
One possible science fair project name could be "Equine Perception: Investigating Color Vision in Horses." Another option could be "Seeing the Spectrum: An Exploration of Color Perception in Equines." These names effectively convey the focus on studying how horses perceive color and would be suitable for a science fair project on this topic.
well, why don't you take a minute and think about it. Science is constantly proving religion wrong and it gives science an underlying purpose to keep moving forward with its work in every category while religion is constantly revising its interpretations of an apparently flawless book. While at the same time religion needs science because it does actually explain how some of the "miracles" could have occured if the people in the stories were the thinking kind of people who could predict wind patterns and sun locations. In short, they need each other I have a slightly different take on this subject. With regards to the first half of the statement, "science without religion is lame", I equate the statement to mean that science would be uninspiring and dull without religion. I infer this interpretation because of another of his quotes, "We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality." The second part of of the statement, "religion without science is blind", may be paraphrased as theories or attitudes held by people or organizations can go off in the wrong direction if not subjected to a structured and systematic study. Just my 2 cents.
Newton's mechanistic view of the universe posited that the cosmos operates like a vast, interconnected machine governed by universal laws of motion and gravitation. He believed that all physical phenomena could be explained through mathematical principles, emphasizing cause and effect. This perspective reduced the need for supernatural explanations, suggesting that the universe is predictable and orderly. Newton's ideas laid the groundwork for classical physics and transformed our understanding of nature.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
It is unknown, some have speculated he may have been a deist and maybe even a skeptic. What we do know he was raised a Christian.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
This is unknown, but it is believed that they could speak.
Unknown. But it is believed that they could speak.
This perspective is known as physicalism. It posits that all mental events and processes can be ultimately explained by physical processes in the brain and nervous system. Physicalism is a key view in contemporary philosophy of mind and cognitive science.
nature could be explained though abstract reasoning an exper........
Ya tu saves cabron ! that's what they believed