Basically, if a star has more mass than another, it will become hotter, and produce more power - more light. Also, a star changes throughout its development - for example, it may start weak, then grow brighter over time.
On the other hand, if there are two stars that are equally bright, one of them may SEEM brighter for us, if it is closer to us.
It depends what the star is made up of, therefore burning a different color.
No. The stars are not only not the same brightness, they are not the same distance from us - they just "appear" to be as part of the optical illusion of earthbound astronomy. They are all of varying brightness, though fairly close in brightness overall.
NO. Stars have difference colors depending on their temperature. The hottest stars are blue and cold stars are red.
no, stars temperature are diffrent according to their color. for instance, blue white stars are hotter than red stars
Generally, yes. For stars on the main sequence, meaning that they fuse hydrogen at their cores, mass, size, color, brightness, and temperature are all closely related. More massive stars are larger, brighter and hotter than less massive ones. The least massive stars are red. As you go to more massive stars color changes to orange, then yellow, then white, and finally to blue for the most massive stars.
the brightness of a star is dependant on its temperature and radius. however, while a star is burning hydrogen into helium (which all stars do for most of their lifespan and it's usually this kind of object we mean when we say "star") a correlation does exist between the mass of the star and its luminosity (brightness)
It indicates the brightness of all the stars.
No. The stars are not only not the same brightness, they are not the same distance from us - they just "appear" to be as part of the optical illusion of earthbound astronomy. They are all of varying brightness, though fairly close in brightness overall.
NO. Stars have difference colors depending on their temperature. The hottest stars are blue and cold stars are red.
no they are not
because the sun takes all its energy so all that is left is the brightness of the stars
Yes. No star has ever been observed that does not. Empirical observational evidencetherefore suggests that every star does, although there is yet no theoretical explanationfor why this should be true.
no, stars temperature are diffrent according to their color. for instance, blue white stars are hotter than red stars
Generally, yes. For stars on the main sequence, meaning that they fuse hydrogen at their cores, mass, size, color, brightness, and temperature are all closely related. More massive stars are larger, brighter and hotter than less massive ones. The least massive stars are red. As you go to more massive stars color changes to orange, then yellow, then white, and finally to blue for the most massive stars.
the brightness of a star is dependant on its temperature and radius. however, while a star is burning hydrogen into helium (which all stars do for most of their lifespan and it's usually this kind of object we mean when we say "star") a correlation does exist between the mass of the star and its luminosity (brightness)
no
No. Stars vary in mass, color, size, temperature, and composition of trace elements.
Antares is a red supergiant star, therefore, its red. Supergiants are aging stars about to run out of fuel. Comparison of Antares with Our SunDiameterMilesTemperature°FahrenheitVisualMagnitude*AbsoluteMagnitude**DensitySun = 1MassSun = 1Sun885,0009900°-26.7+4.81.001.00Antares500,000,0006300°+0.98-4.01/1,000,00010 - 15Tabular information gleaned from The Cambridge Atlas of Astronomy (1994)* Brightness of a star as seen from the earth.** Brightness of a star as it would appear if they were all the same distance from the earth. This is the true relative brightness.↑souledout.com