0
Why do people persist in believing conspiracy theories eg Moon landing hoax or 911 truthers despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary?
The main problem about fake conspiracies is that some people like to hoax and trick others (in the media, newspapers, Net, all sorts), and that's a fact.
I used to work in the printing/publishing trade. I worked innocently for some time, and then the boss started to tell myself and teach myself "touching up films" that meant, basically, camera tricks that make something look for real when it's printed (e.g. as a photo or a film or a printout), when its' not for real at all.
The Moon hoax is fairly easy to see through IF you know about photolithography, filmwork and camera tricks in the printing trade. Its' a matter of several layers of film. Its' a type of photographic editing, but its' deceptive. The films that "prove" and the films that "disprove" the Moon landing is actually difficult for most people to see the truth of only because what they are looking at it sometimes a deceptive media-boss lie, it's difficult because the PROOF is edited OUT, to so-called prove something happened when it didn't, or to so-called prove it didn't happen when it DID.
About the Moon landing: it DID HAPPEN. Truly, it did. The photos that seem to give photographic proof is a printing trade hush-hush secret. I've seen later on, after being bashed into a wheelchair by the so-called boss and staff since I told them I was going to go to the Police about things like that, later on I saw both photos that seem to prove the moon-landing happened, and photos that seems to prove it didn't. I've looked at both and done some review of how both photos etc., were done, and came up with evidence based on experience of how some photos lie and some tell the truth: the result of it is: MANKIND TRULY DID GO TO THE MOON, the Eagle landed, and those things happened, for real.
There is way more evidence, scientific evidence at that, proving the trade towers AND building 7 came down in precise demolition form. They needed a premise for war, and to get the public and congress behind it the men behind the curtain needed a huge death toll, heck I even wanted to sign up for service after seeing it on tv the first time. However, what you see is'nt always what you get and after looking into the evidence later on I was compelled to believe differently about it. I think it stops being a conspiracy when there is sufficient enough evidence and proof to make conspiracy, truth.
What else can I help you with?
Moon landing controversy?
The moon landing controversy is the belief held by a small number of people that the Apollo moon landings were faked by NASA in a conspiracy. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, including photos, videos, and moon rocks brought back by astronauts, conspiracy theories persist. Scientists, engineers, and astronauts involved in the missions have refuted these claims.
How many sciencentists believe that neil Armstrong went to the moon?
The overwhelming majority of scientists and experts in relevant fields of study believe that Neil Armstrong and the Apollo 11 mission successfully landed on the moon in 1969. The evidence supporting this event is vast, including photographic, video, and physical evidence collected during the mission. Any claims to the contrary are typically considered conspiracy theories without credible evidence.
Why were Wegener's ideas not immediately accepted by the scientific community?
Wegener's ideas of continental drift were not immediately accepted by the scientific community because he did not have a satisfactory explanation for the mechanism that could move continents. Additionally, his hypothesis was contrary to the prevailing scientific beliefs at the time, which focused on fixed continents and seafloor spreading. It wasn't until the development of the theory of plate tectonics in the 1960s that Wegener's ideas gained wider acceptance.
why did people believe geocentric theory?
Because of Ptolemy. This was a case of both secular and religious authorities forcing a theory (which was proven wrong in the ancient world) to be the received wisdom, due to a reluctance to accept new theories. It is taught to scientists nowadays as a warning, to always be on the watch that they do not grow so comfortable with a theory that they will struggle to defend it, even against overwhelming evidence to the contrary..
Why do people think the first moon landing was fake?
No. the technology needed to fake the rocks, transmissions, footage, and photos does not exist *today* let alone back then. You'd need a soundstage miles across, with no interior supports, in a near-perfect vacuum, just for starters. Good luck building that- it'd take the world's steel production for about a decade! Then you'd have to find a way to get rid of 5/6ths of the gravity. So far no one knows a way to lower gravity even one percent; it may not even be possible in this universe.Read more: Was_NASA's_moon_landing_fake
Moon landing controversy?
The moon landing controversy is the belief held by a small number of people that the Apollo moon landings were faked by NASA in a conspiracy. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, including photos, videos, and moon rocks brought back by astronauts, conspiracy theories persist. Scientists, engineers, and astronauts involved in the missions have refuted these claims.
What does childlike faith mean?
A child does not have the capacity to question things like an adult and put their complete trust in their parents/carers. Childlike faith is therefore innocent and unquestioning.
Which religious beliefs contrary to official church teachings?
Polytheism, i.e. multiple gods, and not believing in Christ. Other than that, depends on the church.
What is the Scientific explanation of solar and lunar eclipses bring pestilence or famine?
The scientific fact of the matter is that they don't, in spite of the rumors and folklore to the contrary.
How does a snowflakes look?
Contrary to the general belief the overwhelming majority of snowflakes do not have a particular shape. Just a few have crystalline fractal shapes, similar to tree branches, for example.
How does a snowflake look like?
Contrary to the general belief the overwhelming majority of snowflakes do not have a particular shape. Just a few have crystalline fractal shapes, similar to tree branches, for example.
What theories disprove evolution?
There are no scientific theories that disprove evolution. Evolution is a well-supported scientific theory that is backed by a vast amount of evidence from various scientific fields. Any claims to the contrary are not supported by scientific consensus.
Is there any truth to the conspiracy theory that suggests Barack Obama is a Muslim, and what role does the metaphorical "curtain" play in shaping public perception of his religious beliefs?
There is no truth to the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama is a Muslim. The metaphorical "curtain" represents the misinformation and bias that can shape public perception of his religious beliefs, despite evidence to the contrary.
How many sciencentists believe that neil Armstrong went to the moon?
The overwhelming majority of scientists and experts in relevant fields of study believe that Neil Armstrong and the Apollo 11 mission successfully landed on the moon in 1969. The evidence supporting this event is vast, including photographic, video, and physical evidence collected during the mission. Any claims to the contrary are typically considered conspiracy theories without credible evidence.
Is it proved by science that ghosts are real?
No, definite scientific evidence has never been published nor has any definite evidence to the contrary been produced.
What is Shakespeare's favorite sport?
There is no way from the texts of the plays or the sonnets to obtain personal information about Shakespeare, conspiracy theories to the contrary. It is a 20th Century conceit, based on modern Psychology, to expect authors to inject personal information into their art.
What is William Shakespeare's favorite sport?
There is no way from the texts of the plays or the sonnets to obtain personal information about Shakespeare, conspiracy theories to the contrary. It is a 20th Century conceit, based on modern psychology, to expect authors to inject personal information into their art.
