The star's expansion is caused by an increase in energy. Therefore, the star becomes more luminous and cooler due to production of more energy.
Blue stars are more luminous than other main sequence stars but not necessarily brighter than giant and supergiant stars.
red stars are cooler than the sun
stars
Red Giants
from my text book: "The most luminous stars are so rare you find few in your survey region. There are no O stars at all within 62 PC of Earth. Lower-main-sequence M stars, called red dwarfs, and white dwarfs are so faint they are hard to locate even when they are only a few parsecs from earth."
An irregular luminous band of stars is called a galaxyof stars.
Stars are luminous, shine by themseves. Moon isn't, it can only reflect light.
Blue stars are more luminous than other main sequence stars but not necessarily brighter than giant and supergiant stars.
Strictly speaking, no; stars are incandescent (light resulting from heat) as opposed to luminscent (light resulting from non-thermal based effects). One might, however, safely describe stars as "luminous" in a metaporical sense.
Red stars are cooler than blue stars
Generally, the more massive a star is, the more luminous they are. The most luminous stars appear blue.
luminous
red stars are cooler than the sun
All things, except black holes, are luminous. That includes stars. You might think that some other things are not luminous but that's because you can't see the kinds of light that they emit.
Technically, no nebulae are luminous. The ones that appear as such have stars either within or near them, and the nebulae merely reflect the light emitted by these stars.
A star is a massive, luminous ball of plasma.
sun, stars, CD,