0
What else can I help you with?
What theory best explains the moons origin?
The most widely accepted theory for the origin of the Moon is the giant impact hypothesis, which suggests that the Moon was formed from debris ejected during a collision between Earth and a Mars-sized body early in the Solar System's history. This impact led to the formation of the Moon from the remnants of the collision between Earth and the impacting body.
What three incorrect idea held back the development of modern astronomy from the time of modern astronomy from the time of Aristotle until 16th century?
Scientific theories are based on observations and deductions, and the Ptolemaic theory of the solar system fitted the observations of the planets' positions quite well, so it was not wrong, it was OK until better measurement methods showed that it needed improving. The Ptolemaic model of a planet's orbit, also used by Copernicus, had the planet moving round a small circle called an epicycle once, while the centre of the epicycle moved round a circular path, also once, in the opposite direction. This is not a bad model for an elliptical orbit with low eccentricity, which looks like a circle with an offset centre, which is what the Ptolemaic model describes. But Kepler had Tycho's recent observations when he discovered the new laws of planetary motion in which the planets move in ellipses. Tycho's measurements were just accurate enough to allow Kepler to discover the difference. So the old ideas had to wait until the science of measurements were good enough to point the way to elliptical orbits, and that took a long time.
How long ago was the hypothesis of continental drift is used to explain an event that happened?
The hypothesis of continental drift was proposed by Alfred Wegener in 1912 to explain the jigsaw-like fit of continents, similarities in rock types and fossils, and paleoclimate data. It wasn't widely accepted until the 1960s when evidence from paleomagnetism and seafloor spreading supported the theory.
What is the most commonly accepted theory of the moon's formation, and how does it explain the moon being made from?
The most commonly accepted theory of the moon's formation is the Giant Impact Hypothesis. This theory suggests that a Mars-sized object collided with Earth early in its history, ejecting debris that eventually coalesced to form the moon. This explains why the moon is made mostly of material similar to Earth's mantle and crust.
How long has the universe existed going by the Steady State Theory?
The steady-state theory is obsolete - it is now known that the Universe does change over time (the Steady-State Theory states that it doesn't). According to the Steady-State Theory, the Universe has no beginning and no end.
Why WAS THE PTOLEMAIC THEORY ACCEPTED FOR LONG TIME?
Because the theory had predicted the motions of the planets better than any known method at that time.
How did galileos findings with the telescope disprove the Ptolemaic theory?
A model is never technically disproven or proven. The ptolemaic model is no longer accepted because it does not adequately explain observations. The heliocentric model was accepted gradually because it was a better explanation for observed phenomena. However, people continued to believe the ptolemaic model long after it was irrational to do so.
What theory of albert Einstein was not acceepted for a long time?
brownian motion was accepted early on, but his special and general theories of relativity, and his theory regarding quanta took longer to be accepted by all.
Was Copernicus theory widely accepted?
The heliocentric theory became widely accepted when it was found that the Sun is by a long way the most massive object in the solar system. That happened in the 18th century.
Was Copernicus's theory widely accepted?
The heliocentric theory became widely accepted when it was found that the Sun is by a long way the most massive object in the solar system. That happened in the 18th century.
What old belief about the universe did the new discoveries destroy?
they went against the long accepted geocentric theory.
Why did people not trust in Copernicus when he said earth revolves around the sun instead they believed in Ptolemy?
People did not trust Copernicus's heliocentric model primarily because it challenged the long-standing Ptolemaic geocentric view that had been endorsed by the Church and widely accepted for centuries. The Ptolemaic system was deeply ingrained in cultural and religious beliefs, making it difficult for people to accept a radically different perspective. Additionally, Copernicus lacked sufficient observational evidence to convincingly argue for his theory at the time, leading many to remain skeptical of his claims.
Whose theory of the universe was held as law for a thousand years even though it was wrong?
The Ptolemaic theory of the planets lasted 1400 years, and it lasted so long because it was not very wrong. But when Galileo discovered all the phases of Venus, the theory's days were numbered. This did not happen until Galileo came along with his telescope to study the night sky.
Whose theory of universe was held as law for thousands of years even though it was wrong?
The Ptolemaic theory of the planets lasted 1400 years, and it lasted so long because it was not very wrong. But when Galileo discovered all the phases of Venus, the theory's days were numbered. This did not happen until Galileo came along with his telescope to study the night sky.
What is a good sentence with the word heliocentric theory?
The Vatican did not believe in heliocentric theory for a long time.
Why was Copernicus' work controversial?
Because people liked to believe that the Earth was at the centre of the universe and the Ptolemaic model of the universe had been seen as accurate for so long that any other idea was disapproved. It's like Darwin's theory of evolution, at the time nobody liked to believe it, it was only years later that we realised it was an extremely likely theory.
A chemical theory that has been known for a long time becomes a law?
When a chemical theory is repeatedly tested and proven to be true under a variety of conditions over a significant period of time, it may be elevated to the status of a law. This indicates that the relationship described by the theory is a fundamental and universally accepted principle in chemistry.
