No. It does not have enough mass. Only stars 8 times the mass of the sun or greater can become pulsars. The sun will become a white dwarf.
No, a pulsar has not been discovered near the sun. Pulsars are neutron stars that emit beams of radiation that can be detected by astronomers, but they are typically found in distant regions of our galaxy.
No. A pulsar is a neutron star.
Pulsar Stargrave was created in 1977.
One turn around the sun is called a year.
Yes.The sun will turn red.It is called a red giant by the way.
No. A pulsar contains the mass of the Sun, squeezed into a ball 20km (12 1/2 miles) across
No. There is only one star in our Solar System, the Sun and it is not a pulsar.
no, it formed from a nebula, then condensed
A Pulsar.
No, a pulsar is not a part of the solar system. Pulsars are highly magnetized, rotating neutron stars that emit beams of electromagnetic radiation, while the solar system consists of the Sun, planets, and other celestial objects that are gravitationally bound to the Sun.
No, a pulsar has not been discovered near the sun. Pulsars are neutron stars that emit beams of radiation that can be detected by astronomers, but they are typically found in distant regions of our galaxy.
Nebula. according to nasa.
We would all be killed in the supernova explosion that created the pulsar out of our Sun. The Earth itself would be vaporized. Any returning space travelers would be fried by the intense pulses of gamma radiation that give the "pulsar" or "pulsing gamma ray source" its name. However, this cannot happen - because our Sun isn't nearly massive enough to go supernova.
A black dwarf is a dead white dwarf. By dead, I mean a star that no longer burns. A white dwarf, in turn, is a dead "moderate" star (a star like our sun). So a black dwarf is a star that's died twice, with mass not much higher or probably lower than that of our sun. A supernova, is the "death" of a star that's really huge. By huge, I mean it has a mass that's considerably higher than that of our sun. That kind of star doesn't turn into a white dwarf. Rather, it becomes either a neutron star (pulsar or non-pulsar) or a black hole.
First of all, the main distinguishing factor between Pulsar 150 and Pulsar 135 is the cost. Pulsar 150, as the name says, 150cc has more power, pick up and speed when compared to Pulsar 135. But, pulsar 135 has also got the equivalent features of Pulsar 150. (Because of the latest technology) In a nutshell, Pulsar 135 is a lite version of Pulsar 150. And, my opinion, Pulsar 150 is better...
Our Sun is at least a 3rd generation star; the solar system formed from the debris blasted into space by countless - or at least, unknowable - numbers of supernova explosions of old dead stars. Some of those could well have left stellar cores that were pulsars. But it's unlikely that any of the Sun's mass was ever in a pulsar; the mass contained in a pulsar is so tightly bound by gravity that it is unlikely that any could ever escape. About the only way that any pulsar mass might have escaped would be if two neutron stars (and a pulsar is just a spinning neutron star) were to collide. Some of the mass might escape from the explosion, which would probably create a black hole as the result.
No pulsar 200 is not available the best substitutes are Pulsar 220 s and Pulsar 180ug 4