NO!!!!
Because atmospheric nitrogen is fixated into plants. Thereby by anaimal comsumption nitrogen is ingestied into animals and humans. Human being would have no strength, because nitrogen is a vital element in proteins.
There are several bio-chemical cycles. They Are'-
Nitrogen Cycle
Oxygen Cycle
Carbon Cycle.
Phosphorus Cycle
With out these cycles Biology would NOT function.
the most gaseous inner planet would be Venus, also the hottest planet
Without humans on Earth, nature would continue to thrive and ecosystems would function without human interference. Many man-made structures would eventually decay and be reclaimed by the environment. Wildlife would flourish as populations adjust to a world without human impact.
If nitrogen and oxygen in the atmosphere were not replenished, they would last a very long time due to their stability and abundance. Nitrogen makes up about 78% of the atmosphere, while oxygen constitutes about 21%. The primary sources of oxygen, such as photosynthesis from plants, are crucial for its continuous supply; without these processes, oxygen levels would gradually decrease over centuries. However, nitrogen is inert and doesn't get consumed in significant amounts, meaning it could theoretically last indefinitely without replacements.
If a planet is not in orbit around a star, it would either drift off into space or be captured by another gravitational force. Without being in orbit, a planet would not experience the necessary gravitational pull to maintain a stable path around a star.
Gravity holds a planet's atmosphere close to its surface. The gravitational force of the planet's mass prevents the gases in the atmosphere from escaping into space. Without gravity, the atmosphere would disperse into space.
giddohgdhybudui
It would be hell on earth.
Without nitrogen in the atmosphere, we would be breathing in nearly pure oxygen, which would be fatal.
The atomosphere would be explosive otherwise and the planet uninhabitable. Nitrogen acts as nature's diluent.
Mercury is a terrestrial planet and does not have a significant atmosphere. Therefore, nitrogen levels on Mercury are typically very low. Any nitrogen present on Mercury would likely be as trace amounts within the planet's crust.
In theory, it would be possible to land on a planet without fling.
Proteins are mostly made of nitrogen. Almost everything in your body is made of proteins so we would die without nitrogen.
without nitrogen our bodys would over oxygenate (get to much oxygen). nitrogen is important for plants, after all they breath in nitrogen and breath out oxygen.
Without air, we would not be able to live, We would try to breathe in oxygen but there would be none there so we would shrivel up and die, just like in space, that's why astronauts wear space suits so they can breathe.
Nitrogen is necessary for life on earth. Without nitrogen, which makes up some 78% of the earth's atmosphere, we would be breathing in nearly pure oxygen and that would be fatal.
Proteins would be the most affected by limited nitrogen because they are composed of amino acids, which contain nitrogen. Without enough nitrogen, the synthesis of proteins would be limited, impacting various cellular processes and functions.
If you mean what is the biggest planet without an atmosphere, then the answer would be Mercury.