NO.
DVDs have a better,newer technology incorporated.
The quality of the DVD movies is higher than the cassette's and the sound can be on more channels, 6 usually, while at a cassette sound is on 2 channels maximum.
DVD's are the digital equivalent of the old video tapes. DVD's are more robust than tape, don't wear out, and take up much less space in your collection than a video cassette would.
Cd's are more commonly used for music in cars now,cassettes are outdated,though they are still rarely used.
Cassette and VHS tapes, and anything with a screen.
2. They're not designed to hold no more than 2.
A cassette tape was the standard of audio recording through the 1980's and 1990's mainly. Before then, there were 8-tracks and reel-to-reel tape for which people could record with, but the cassette market dominated it. So, basically, it was used as a music medium, and to make amatuer recordings.
Yes. You need a cord that will connect the MP3 player's headphone jack to the inputs on the cassette recorder. You may need to adjust the volume settings on both machines to find the best levels for copying.
DVDs are better quality and don't wear out as fast. They hav spesh features
DVDs have made the distribution of films much easier than VHS tapes. They take up less room and are more durable than other formats. Netflix would not exist without DVDs.
JVC will give you a slightly better sound from the cassette deck than the Teac.
DVDs are a digital medium, whereas VHS tapes are an analogue medium. All digital movie mediums, including DVDs, are compressed in order to fit the huge amount of data (an image for every movie frame) into the available space. This compression can be seen if you look for it - particularly in darker areas, or large blocks of colour with little movement from frame to frame. Technically then, an analogue picture will always be of higher quality than a digital picture, however in the case of VHS the picture quality is largely affected by the tape. If you had a brand new, high quality video cassette being played in a professional grade multi-head video cassette player, the quality should in theory be superior to a DVD. However, over time the tape will degrade and become worn, even stretched. VHS tapes are also susceptible to magnetic interference. DVDs have none of these problems. With analogue pictures, there are varying grades of quality. Think about when TV was analogue: in a strong signal area with good equipment, the picture could be perfect; but in weaker signal areas with poor equipment, the picture becomes snowy and degraded. Digital is not the same - it's either on or off. There or not there. So, whilst a digital picture is inferior in theory to an analogue picture, in most cases a better and more consistent quality is available in digital media. Because of this consistent quality, the image will look much the same on cheap equipment as it does on expensive equipment. The same can certainly not be said of VHS. DVDs also have the advantage of menus, special features, languages, chapters and many other features that VHS tape simply can't provide. And, these days, DVDs are much cheaper and faster to produce than VHS tape.
To watch movies with them, record on them, play PC games with them, to install operating systems on them, etc. Also, DVDs have better quality than VHS.
Yes their is more cds than DVDs