MHz (Megahertz) is used to measure several different things, so it depends on the context.
NO, a HDMI cable is just a HDMI cable. The 240 stuff is just hype.
pass 240 volts through it
Personaly, i have to R/C cars that are 27 MHZ and 49 MHZ and my 49 MHZ goes faster than the 27 MHZ. but the 27 MHZ has much more control than the 49 MHZ.
Yes, megahertz (MHz) is greater than kilohertz (KHz). Specifically, 1 MHz is equal to 1,000 KHz, meaning that MHz represents a higher frequency than KHz. Therefore, when comparing the two, any value in MHz will always be larger than the same value expressed in KHz.
1.10 MHz is tremendously slower than 750 MHz. If you meant 1.10 GHz vs. 750 MHz, then yes, 1.10 GHz is faster than 750 MHz.
If talking about processors then, no.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
speed ofcource.. 800 mhz PC will be slower than 1099 mhz PC because of slow data rate..
Higher MHz (megahertz) typically indicates a faster clock speed, which can lead to better performance in processors and other electronic devices. However, the effectiveness of higher MHz also depends on other factors such as architecture, efficiency, and the specific application. In some cases, a balance between MHz and other performance metrics is essential for optimal results. Therefore, while higher MHz can be better, it is not the sole determinant of overall performance.
1795 mhz = 1.795 ghz there pretty close, but no.
No, the Geforce GTX 480 should beat the GTX 295 statistically speaking (although they are close in performance): Geforce GTX 295: -Core Clock: 576 MHz -Shader Clock: 1242 MHz -Memory Clock: 1000 MHz -Processing Cores: 480 Geforce GTX 480: -Core Clock: 700 MHz -Shader Clock: 1401 MHz -Memory Clock: 1848 MHz -Processing Cores: 480
The choice between a 30 MHz and a 100 MHz antenna depends on the intended application. A 30 MHz antenna is typically better suited for long-range communication, as lower frequencies can propagate over longer distances and penetrate obstacles more effectively. Conversely, a 100 MHz antenna is generally more suitable for higher data rates and shorter-range applications, such as FM broadcasting or certain types of telemetry. Ultimately, the "better" option depends on your specific needs and operating environment.