MHz (Megahertz) is used to measure several different things, so it depends on the context.
NO, a HDMI cable is just a HDMI cable. The 240 stuff is just hype.
pass 240 volts through it
Personaly, i have to R/C cars that are 27 MHZ and 49 MHZ and my 49 MHZ goes faster than the 27 MHZ. but the 27 MHZ has much more control than the 49 MHZ.
The comparison between 850 MHz and 1900 MHz depends on the context of usage. Generally, lower frequencies like 850 MHz can penetrate buildings better and cover larger areas, making them better for rural or suburban coverage. In contrast, higher frequencies like 1900 MHz can offer greater data speeds and capacity in urban environments but have a shorter range. Therefore, the "better" frequency depends on the specific needs for coverage versus speed.
Yes, 2.40 GHz is higher than 500 MHz. To compare the two, it's important to convert them to the same unit: 2.40 GHz is equivalent to 2400 MHz. Therefore, 2400 MHz is significantly greater than 500 MHz.
Yes, megahertz (MHz) is greater than kilohertz (KHz). Specifically, 1 MHz is equal to 1,000 KHz, meaning that MHz represents a higher frequency than KHz. Therefore, when comparing the two, any value in MHz will always be larger than the same value expressed in KHz.
1.10 MHz is tremendously slower than 750 MHz. If you meant 1.10 GHz vs. 750 MHz, then yes, 1.10 GHz is faster than 750 MHz.
If talking about processors then, no.
No. It is 100 MHz slower.
speed ofcource.. 800 mhz PC will be slower than 1099 mhz PC because of slow data rate..
To compare 3.9 GHz and 150 MHz, we first convert both to the same unit. 3.9 GHz is equal to 3900 MHz. Now, dividing 3900 MHz by 150 MHz gives us 26. Therefore, 3.9 GHz is 26 times faster than 150 MHz.
Higher MHz (megahertz) typically indicates a faster clock speed, which can lead to better performance in processors and other electronic devices. However, the effectiveness of higher MHz also depends on other factors such as architecture, efficiency, and the specific application. In some cases, a balance between MHz and other performance metrics is essential for optimal results. Therefore, while higher MHz can be better, it is not the sole determinant of overall performance.