No. The working class, or Proletariat, was oppressed by the upper class, which he called the Bourgeoisie. Marx gave paid very little attention to the middle class, which he called the petty bourgeoisie, feeling that the middle class was more apt to aspire to be part of the upper class than the lower class.
middle class lower classs upper class
A market for mass-produced goods
Barbarians = aristocracy Philistines = middle class populace = working class
Yes it did
Middle working class
working hard
Burgoisies The well-to-do and the poor (Apex)
Axe
working hard
middle point
The original meaning is: people in the middle of the social hierarchy; better off and 'higher up' than blue-collar workers, but not belonging to the financial and/or social elite. The British made and still make the distinction between 'lower middle class' - more or less equal to what Americans most often mean when they use the term middle class - and 'upper middle class', meaning well-to-do, and often holding high-level jobs, and as families, well- established in British society. In the US, 'middle class' usually means: college or university educated, homeowner, being able to build up savings more or less sufficient for early retirement, being able to pay for a college education for their kids, working in middle management jobs or running mid-sized companies or as 'professionals' such as lawyers, dentists, accountants etcetera.
According to former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer, who led the CIA's hunt for Osama bin Laden, the al-Qaeda leader was motivated by a belief that U.S. foreign policy has oppressed, killed, or otherwise harmed Muslims in the Middle East, condensed in the phrase "They hate us for what we do, not who we are."