A critique of written work can provide valuable feedback on areas of improvement, highlight strengths and weaknesses in the writing, offer suggestions for enhancing clarity and coherence, and help the writer develop their skills and craft.
WikiAnswers is not a critique website. If you want critique, you should ask friends and family to read over your work, or join a good critique group that will help you.
The purpose of a review of a written work is to provide feedback and critique on various aspects such as plot, characters, writing style, and overall impact. Reviews help readers decide whether to engage with the work and also offer insights to the author for potential improvements.
A formal critique describes why the critic liked or disliked a work of art.
The critique process typically involves: observing and analyzing the work, identifying strengths and weaknesses, providing feedback in a constructive manner, and offering suggestions for improvement. It is important to balance positive feedback with areas for growth to help the person receiving the critique develop their skills.
A formal critique will describe why the critic liked or disliked a work of art.
WikiAnswers is not really a writing critique site. I have linked some good writing critique sites for you below - also, some Related Questions about how to edit and critique your own work!
A formal critique will describe why the critic liked or disliked a work of art.
A formal critique will describe why the critic liked or disliked a work of art.
MOTTAHEDEH has written: 'CLASH OF CIVILIZATIONS: AN ISLAMICIST'S CRITIQUE'
J. Theriault has written: 'Critique de l'americanite'
John Crump has written: 'A contribution to the critique of Marx'
IAIN MACKENZIE has written: 'IDEA OF PURE CRITIQUE'