Yes he is. He was not biassed at all. He wrote the truth and that's it.
You can tell that a test is reliable when many can take it and it holds up. A reliable test can't be biased, and it must measure what it says it's going to measure. A reliable test stands up when compared to other tests.
He is not the most reliable because he is biased. He is too close to the situation.
He is not the most reliable because he is biased. He is too close to the situation.
The narrator of The Old Man and the Sea, being a third-person omniscient point of view, is considered reliable as they have access to both the old man's thoughts and outside events. The narrator's portrayal of the old man's thoughts and actions is intended to be objective rather than biased.
biased
biased :
biased :
If you are reading accounts about a dispute between two starlets who were wearing the same gown, a third party with no interest in the dispute would be the least likely to be biased. Reports from friends of either starlet would typically be biased.
By looking up previous things they have said in other different pieces of text. Comparing them, decide if you think they are biased, give your reasons in a list of Why it is biased and Why it is not Biased, if you Why it is outrules your It Is then you will know, if this is for school I have no ****ing clue.
A passerby who was not involved but witnessed it all is least likely to be biased in his or her account of the accident.
Here are some questions you should ask:Is the narrator reliable? -- Can you trust what he or she says?Why is the narrator telling this story?Why did the author choose to tell the story this way?Is the narrator biased, or missing things that you as the reader can see?
"The author's biased presentation of statistics undermines the credibility of their argument."