Yes, Thoreau's concept of civil disobedience is compatible with democratic government as it promotes nonviolent resistance to unjust laws while still respecting the principles of democracy. Thoreau believed in individual conscience and the duty to resist immoral laws through peaceful means, which aligns with democratic values of freedom of expression and participation in government decision-making. However, civil disobedience also challenges the status quo and can lead to societal change, which may sometimes be viewed as disruptive to democratic systems.
B. The interference with his protest. Thoreau was angry about being jailed because he felt it was unjust and interfered with his civil disobedience against an unjust government.
His transcendentalist ideas basically motivated people to "get of their asses, and do something", thus making people actually rely on themselves. Thoreau's works benefited society, in that people actually started to rely on themselves rather than on other people.
The role the government should play in people's lives
Full of rhetorical devices.
It is about the author's experience of living alone. (APEX)
Both Barack Obama's inaugural speech and Henry David Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" emphasize the importance of individual responsibility and civic engagement in the pursuit of justice and democracy. Obama calls for collective action and unity to address societal challenges, while Thoreau advocates for the moral duty to resist unjust laws. Together, they highlight the necessity of standing up for one's beliefs to effect positive change in society.
Full of rhetorical devices.
Henry David Thoreauâ??s â??On Civil Disobedienceâ?? has had a long and far reaching impact. Leaders like John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King admit to being influenced by the work. In addition, American writers like Sinclair Lewis and Ernest Hemingway also drew inspiration from it.
Henry David Thoreau believed in individual conscience and resistance to unjust laws. He emphasized the power of individual action and civil disobedience rather than relying solely on voting as a means of creating change. Thoreau believed in personal responsibility and standing up against injustice, regardless of legal structures.
it showed that people can be self sufficient and don't have to be slaves.
To explain when a person has a moral obligation to disobey the law
It could be argued that Thoreauâ??s concept of a standing government should only be there as a consequence of the people allowing it to exist presupposes that all â??the peopleâ?? are comprised of those only capable of good intentions, whereas the government is not. Yet, we have seen the actions of some that can only be viewed as evil. If these bullies possess the personal power to push thru their evil intentions, are those of us lacking this ability not at the mercy of these efforts without a standing government to stop it?