I have felt rapport with Haruki Murakami due to his dreamlike storytelling and exploration of human emotions. On the other hand, I have felt little rapport with Ayn Rand due to her heavy-handed philosophizing and lack of emotional depth in her characters. The difference lies in the ability of the writer to connect with the reader on an emotional and intellectual level.
I felt rapport with Haruki Murakami due to his introspective and dreamlike writing style, which resonated with me. In contrast, I felt little rapport with James Joyce due to his complex and experimental writing techniques, which I found challenging to connect with. The difference lies in the personal inclination towards specific writing styles, themes, and narrative approaches that align with individual preferences and experiences.
The difference is without one then no one with agree, be concern, or care about your claim.
Stephen king is a writer with whom I have felt rapport with. Stephen king writings seem to reach out and grab the peoples attention.
What is a rapport writter?
stephen king was awriter with no rapport.
A writer with little or no effort in building rapport may come across as distant or detached in their writing. This can hinder the ability to connect with readers on a personal level and may lead to a lack of engagement or interest in the content. It is important for writers to establish a connection with their audience through relatable and engaging writing to create a meaningful impact.
Dan Brown, poor characterisation and dialgoue
Neil Gaiman is a writer known for establishing rapport with his readers through engaging storytelling and relatable characters. His works, such as "American Gods" and "The Sandman" series, often resonate with readers on a personal level, creating a strong connection between the writer and audience.
Any word that is all caps in email signifies that the writer is yelling.
A fashion designer designs and a writer writes.
There's very little difference - they both look alike and perform very similar functions.
there is no difference.