you answer it
It could be argued that Thoreauâ??s concept of a standing government should only be there as a consequence of the people allowing it to exist presupposes that all â??the peopleâ?? are comprised of those only capable of good intentions, whereas the government is not. Yet, we have seen the actions of some that can only be viewed as evil. If these bullies possess the personal power to push thru their evil intentions, are those of us lacking this ability not at the mercy of these efforts without a standing government to stop it?
The objections against a standing army often include concerns about unchecked power, potential tyranny, and the threat to civil liberties. Similarly, a standing government can be criticized for becoming entrenched and resistant to change, leading to bureaucratic inefficiencies and a disconnect from the populace. Both institutions may foster an environment where authority is centralized and dissent is stifled, raising questions about accountability and the protection of individual rights. Ultimately, the critiques highlight the need for oversight and adaptability in both military and governmental structures to safeguard democracy.
Who did it belong to and whose claim on it had standing.
The question is incomplete. There are no options given (for "which of the following") to answer this question.
The role the government should play in people's lives
unlimited because of the power of the leaders that were standing in the place of government
Democratic. With a long standing female Prime Minister.
Using logic, emotions, and expert standing to make a point is sometimes referred to as making a persuasive argument or employing ethos, logos, and pathos.
To make peace with someone after a long-standing argument, start by acknowledging the conflict and expressing a genuine desire to resolve it. Approach the conversation with an open mind and a willingness to listen to their perspective without interrupting. Share your feelings honestly but respectfully, aiming for understanding rather than winning the argument. Finally, propose a constructive way forward, whether it’s agreeing to disagree, setting new boundaries, or finding common ground to rebuild the relationship.
Government backed financing is financing that has the promise of the government standing behind it. It is different from private investor financing or bank backed financing.
That the army is one part of the government
It's judicial powers and its' standing army.