To evaluate the author's logic, one should consider the coherence of the arguments presented, the evidence provided to support those arguments, the clarity of the reasoning, and whether any potential counterarguments or flaws have been addressed effectively. It's also important to evaluate whether the conclusions drawn by the author logically follow from the premises presented.
The author comes to various outlandish conclusions that lead the reader to question his credibility. -apex
L ratio
an identity? maybe a tautology? Comment by mgately: In the field of discrete mathematics (simplified the study of logic) any expression which always evaluates to true is in fact called a tautology. While less cool sounding, an expression which always evaluates to false is just called a contradiction.
I don't agree that fuzzy logic is the best approach to uncertainty
Certainly fuzzy logic is not the best in solving uncertainty, but..... it is on of the best alternatives to that exists to model uncertainty.
Take a course on mathematical logic at the nearest college.
Logic Studio.
Not sure, but P.C. Cast and Kristin Cast (the authors) are best selling authors.
magic and elements of the supernatrual
The last paragraph of the article best supports the authors argument. This is because this paragraph brings all of the authors findings together.
Here are some links to show you some of the best-selling authors.
He is to me.