Karl Marx did not explicitly state that in order to establish equality, we must first establish inequality in any of his major works like "The Communist Manifesto" or "Das Kapital." Marx's philosophy primarily focused on the critique of capitalism and the exploitation of the working class by the bourgeoisie. His goal was to create a classless society where wealth and power were distributed equally among all individuals.
gender advocacy fails to remove gender inequality because there is no how we can bring equality taking sides when addressing some issues. Favors are not given equally. gender advocacy cannot be seen as equality of genders, however it can go a long way towards resolving gender inequality already in existence, in order to properly answer this question one must first address the issue of the definition of equality and how it applies, overall equality does not provide for an equality of outcomes which is why gender advocacy does not adhere to equality, it can still provide equality.
There is no one reason; there are many factors. The first important thing to realise is that there has never been 'equality' in India or any of the individual states of India. (Depending on what you mean by 'equality'/'inequality', you could also argue that there has never been total equality anywhere in the world, ever.) Those who have been in power have never wanted total equality, and have done little to try to realise it. Inequality is traditional in India (and in some of the religions practised in India). India is vast spatially and in population. The project of creating 'equality' is such a long-term project that any politician in power that attempted it would be long out of office and probably dead before it could be completed. Humans are intrinsically greedy and selfish - that is how people survive. The reasons go on and on. More interesting questions are what you mean by equality and why you expect it.
john
With the equal sign (=).
It is a linear inequality.
To graph inequalities, first, begin by rewriting the inequality in slope-intercept form (y = mx + b) if necessary. Next, graph the corresponding equation as if it were an equality, using a solid line for ≤ or ≥ and a dashed line for < or >. Then, determine which side of the line to shade by testing a point not on the line (usually the origin) to see if it satisfies the inequality. Finally, shade the appropriate region to represent all solutions of the inequality.
James Boswell first stated this.
i went to the pak who were the first people to establish Paris
The first is 2-dimensional, the second is 1-dimensional.
It is easiest to describe the difference in terms of coordinate geometry. A linear equation defines a straight line in the coordinate plane. Every point on the line satisfies the equation and no other points do. For a linear inequality, first consider the corresponding linear equality (or equation). That defines a straight line which divides the plane into two. Depending on the direction of the inequality, all points on one side of the line or the other satisfy the equation, and no point from the other side of the line does. If it is a strict inequality (< or >) then points on the line itself are excluded while if the inequality is not strict (≤or ≥) then points on the line are included.
factories.
The first is 2-dimensional, the second is 1-dimensional.