answersLogoWhite

0

Machiavelli believed that a ruler must be both feared and loved, but if they cannot be both, it is better to be feared than loved. He also emphasized the importance of being cunning, adaptable, and willing to act ruthlessly when necessary to maintain power.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why does Machiavelli say that a ruler must show himself to be capable of cruelty to his army?

Machiavelli believed that displaying a willingness to be cruel could help a ruler maintain authority and deter any challenges to their power. By showing a capacity for ruthlessness, a ruler could instill fear in their army and potential adversaries, establishing control and preventing rebellion.


Machiavelli encouraged rulers and would be rulers to believe that?

A.human nature was self-centered. B.human nature was to be truthful. C.woman were superior to men. D.the church should be discredited. the answer is( A.human nature was self-centered.)


Why according to Machiavelli must a person sometimes act as a beast?

Machiavelli believed that sometimes a ruler needs to act in a ruthless or merciless manner in order to maintain power and stability in a state. This may involve using force, deception, or cruelty to achieve desired outcomes or to prevent chaos and disorder. Such actions can be seen as necessary for a ruler to navigate the complexities of politics and ensure the survival of their state.


What is Machiavellis argument?

Machiavelli argues that a ruler should prioritize maintaining power and authority, even if it means using deceit, manipulation, and cruelty. He believes that the ends justify the means and that a ruler must be able to adapt their actions to suit the circumstances in order to achieve stability and control.


What was the central theme of Niccolo Machiavelli book the prince?

i believe the major thesis was that any ruler who wishes to retain absolute control of his territory must use, not only wisdom and skill, but cunning and ruthlessness through fear rather than love.


What is machiavelli main argument?

Machiavelli's main argument in "The Prince" is that a ruler must prioritize power and effectiveness over moral considerations in order to maintain stability and control over his realm. He emphasizes the importance of being flexible and pragmatic in governance and suggests that rulers should be willing to use deception and manipulation if necessary to achieve their goals.


Describe the political philosophy set forth in Machiavelli's 'The Prince'?

Machiavelli's 'The Prince' promotes the idea that a ruler should prioritize maintaining power and stability over adherence to traditional moral principles. The text emphasizes the importance of leadership qualities such as cunning, flexibility, and decisiveness in navigating the complex political landscape of the time. Machiavelli suggests that rulers must be willing to act ruthlessly when necessary for the greater good of their state.


What three things did Confucius the Master believe a ruler must provide?

Ruler to Minister Father to Son Husband to Wife Older to Younger Friend to Friend


What is Machiavelli called the new prince?

Machiavelli refers to a new prince as someone who has recently come into power and must establish their authority and control over their new territory. The new prince faces unique challenges in maintaining power and must be both ruthless and strategic in their approach according to Machiavelli's principles.


What was Machiavelli's view of how rulers should behave?

In "The Prince," Machiavelli believed a ruler should do whatever it takes to keep and extend power. He states that while honest leaders are admired, the princes who exhibit traits of cunning, guile and trickery are the ones who are most successful. To rule, the prince must learn to use both laws and force to his advantage.


Why is Machiavelli the father of modern political science?

he outlined the characteristics that an effective leader must have


Which was one of machiavelli main argument in the prince?

Good leaders sometimes have to be cruel for the overall good of their society.