To provide an accurate response, I would need to see the specific passage you're referring to. Could you please share the passage or provide more context?
The authors claim is not supported by strong evidence
The type of audience appeal the author is making in the passage apex can vary, but it usually involves emotional, logical, or ethical reasoning to persuade or engage the readers. These appeals aim to connect with the audience on different levels to support the argument or message of the passage.
It depends on the passage you have. If the passage is... ”In the last 60 days, over 425 billion text messages were sent in the United States alone.” Then your answer would be... ”Logos“ Apex
can i claim a making work pay credit can i claim a making work pay credit
The Passage was written by Justin Cronin
Making claims without evidence undermines the credibility of the author's argument. Providing evidence supports the claim, makes the argument more convincing, and helps readers understand the basis of the statement.
This passage is an example of inductive reasoning because it draws a general conclusion based on specific observations. By noting the actions of individual ants, it makes a broader claim about the behavior of ants as a group. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations from specific instances, which is evident in this passage.
They caused France to claim land
They caused France to claim land
They caused France to claim land
They caused France to claim land
Yes, Canada claims jurisdiction of the Northwest Passage but this is still contested by the United States.