answersLogoWhite

0

1.How does Machiavelli view human nature?

Machiavelli differs from the many political theorists who offer conceptions of a "natural

state," a presocial condition arising solely from human instinct and character. But while

Machiavelli never puts forth a vision of what society would be like without civil

government, he nonetheless presents a coherent, although not particularly comprehensive,

vision of human nature. Machiavelli mentions explicitly a number of traits innate among

humans. People are generally self-interested, although their affections for others can be

won and lost. They remain content and happy so long they avoid affliction or oppression.

They might be trustworthy in prosperous times, but they can turn selfish, deceitful, and

profit-driven in adverse times. They admire honor, generosity, courage, and piety in

others, but most do not harbor these virtues. Ambition lies among those who have

achieved some power, but most common people are satisfied with the way things are and

therefore do not yearn to improve on the status quo. People will naturally feel obligated

after receiving a favor or service, and this bond is usually not broken capriciously.

Nevertheless, loyalties are won and lost, and goodwill is never absolute. These statements

about human nature often serve as justification for much of Machiavelli's advice to

princes. For example, a prince should never trust mercenary leaders because they, like

most leaders, are overly ambitious. At the same time, while many of Machiavelli's

remarks on the subject seem reasonable, most are assumptions not grounded in evidence

or popular notions and can easily be criticized. For example, a Hobbesian might argue

that Machiavelli puts too much faith in people's ability to remain content in the absence

of government force. A related issue to explore, then, might be the extent to which

Machiavelli's political theory relies too heavily on any single, possibly fallacious

depiction of human nature

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Machiavelli encouraged rulers and would-be rulers to believe what?

human nature was self-centered


What did petrarch and Machiavelli have in common?

Petrarch and Machiavelli were both Italian Renaissance writers who deeply influenced literature and political thought. Despite their different areas of focus (Petrarch on poetry and humanism, Machiavelli on political philosophy), they both grappled with the complexities of human nature and ethics in their works.


How is machiavelli ideal for human behavior antithetical to erasmus in the prince of machiavelli?

Machiavelli's ideal for human behavior in "The Prince" emphasizes power, ruthlessness, and deceit for political success, while Erasmus advocates for virtues like kindness and honesty in "The Praise of Folly." Machiavelli believes that leaders should prioritize effectiveness over morality, whereas Erasmus promotes a more ethical and humanistic approach to governance. This fundamental difference in their philosophies reflects contrasting views on leadership and human nature.


Can an animal change its nature to human nature?

i think that we were not at all any monkeys so animals can not change there nature to human nature


From Machiavelli's point of view what attitude should a prince have toward power?

it should be based on an understanding of human nature, which he believed was basically self-centered


Why was Machiavelli not a Machiavellian?

Machiavelli is often seen as not embodying the characteristics of a Machiavellian figure because his work "The Prince" was mainly a commentary on political strategy and government rather than a guide for deceit and manipulation. Additionally, Machiavelli's other works, such as his historical writings, show a more nuanced and complex understanding of human nature and ethics.


What is the dark side of human nature?

The Blind Side of Human Nature.


I like tornadoes do you?

I think it's human nature to be fascinated by them.


How did the writing of petrach boccaccio and machiavelli demonstrate the values of humanism?

The writings of Petrarch, Boccaccio, and Machiavelli reflected humanism by emphasizing the importance of individual potential and agency, promoting the study of classical texts and languages, and seeking to understand human nature and behavior through rational inquiry. They focused on the human experience, ethics, and civic engagement, illustrating a shift towards human-centered values rather than solely religious or divine influence.


Why do humans defy science or nature by breaking records?

It's just human nature and the way we think.


How was Niccolo Machiavelli important to the world?

He wrote about human nature and he was one of the first people in literature that wrote in the vernacular or the everyday language. Which came before Latin. I'm in seventh grade l0l


In what books is human nature a theme?

"Homo Deus" by Yuval Noah Harari explores the future of humanity in relation to technological advancements. "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding examines the inherent darkness in human nature when a group of boys stranded on an island descend into savagery. "The Prince" by Niccolò Machiavelli discusses the political nature of humans and the dynamics of power.