Peter Mark Hughes has written:
'An examination of subsidies provided by public universities to affiliated foundations' -- subject(s): Public universities and colleges, Charitable uses, trusts, and foundations, Finance, Endowments, Educational fund raising
Mark Simon Hughes has written: 'Lithium interactions with erythrocytes studies by NMR and AAS'
Christopher Mark Hughes has written: 'On a complex theory of a simple God' -- subject(s): God, Criticism and interpretation, Knowableness
Mark Peter Hughes
Harry C. Bauer has written: 'The kaleidoscopic mind of Peter Mark Roget'
Mark Goldstein has written: 'Absent all day' -- subject(s): Poetry, Bulimia, Anorexia 'Tracelanguage' 'Form of Forms'
Mark's Gospel was originally written anonymously and remained so until Papias, bishop of Hieropolis in Asia Minor (ca.130), named Mark as the author of the gospel and the 'interpreter' of Peter. The pseudepigraphical second-century First Epistle of Peter (1 Peter) refers to Mark as Peter's son. However, scholars say there is no good reason to believe that Mark was the real author of the Gospel that now bears his name.
The Gospel of Mark was originally written anonymously and only attributed by the Church Fathers to the apostle whose name it now bears later in the second century. There is no good reason to believe that the author was the apostle Mark, but if this was the author, the pseudepigraphical epistle, 1 Peter, says that Mark was the son of Peter.First, it is most unlikely that the author of Mark's Gospel was called Mark, and biblical scholars believe that the author seems not to have been close to anyone who was an eyewitness to the events that his gospel portrays. Second, if the Church Fathers were correct in attributing the epistle to Mark, he may have known Paul, but would not have met Jesus. 1 Peter was not written by the apostle Peter and therefore can not be relied on as evidence that Mark was even related to Peter.
Mark Prent has written: 'Mark Prent'
MARK A. MCINTOSH has written: '\\'
The Church Fathers noticed that 2 Peter 5:13 has Peter refer to Mark as "my son." Unaware that Second Peter is a pseudepigraphical epistle, they assumed this either meant that Mark was indeed the son of Peter or at least that Peter held Mark in high esteem. A tradition subsequently arose that Mark wrote the second gospel based on the memoirs of Peter, although another early tradition was that Mark's Gospel was written as a summary of Matthew's Gospel (the evidence is that Mark's Gospel was actually written before Matthew).Because we now know that 2 Peter was written long after the death of Peter, it can no longer be considered as evidence that Mark even knew Peter. Mark's Gospel was written before Matthew).
Mark Schroeder has written: 'The paintings of Mark Schroeder'
Mark Armstrong has written: 'Victoria'