0
Lamarck's theory, known as Lamarckism, proposed that organisms could pass down acquired traits to their offspring. He suggested that an organism could change during its lifetime in response to its environment and these changes would be inherited by its offspring. However, this theory has been largely discredited in modern Biology.
What else can I help you with?
How is lamarcks theory of evolution different from theory of evolution?
Make me cum daddy~! Make me moan~!
Was lamarcks idea of acquired traits proven or rejected?
rejected.
Why was Lamarcks theory disproved?
Weismann started an experiment, where he cut off tails on many mice, and let them live like that. When they had offspring, their offspring had tails, proving that traits that are altered during a life-span, don't get passed on to the next generation
Whose theory stuck between Lamarck and Darwin?
lamarcks theory of natural selection was accepted as they believed in religion and didnt want to believe anything other than god created our planet. darwin believed in evolution and plants and animals develop without the aid of intelegent creater through natural selection. lamarcks believed animals changed to fit there habitat for eample a girrafe reached for tall tree's and eventually grew into tall necks. At this period of time niether lamarck are darwin new about genes and in that so came up with these theories. hope this helps xoxox
What later evidence disproved Lamarcks theory of acquired characteristics and supported Darwins theory?
Later evidence from genetics and molecular biology showed that acquired traits are not passed down through generations as proposed by Lamarck, as they do not alter the genetic material. On the other hand, Darwin's theory of natural selection was supported by the discovery of the mechanism of inheritance through genes and DNA, providing a more robust explanation for evolutionary change over time.
What are the differences between Darwin's and lamarcks theory of evolution?
Larmark's theory was based on the idea that organisms inherited characteristics that they had acquired in life - so, if you have a scar your offspring will have scars. Darwin's theory assumed that offspring inherited characteristics from their parents, but they were more likely to survive to breed if there was advantage to those characteristics.
How was Darwin's theory of evolution different from lamarcks?
In Darwin's theory, natural selection plays the key role. Organisms vary through random mutations--slight changes from their parents. The environment determines which are most likely to survive. In Lamarck's theory, changes in phenotype are inherited. This is now known to be (largely) incorrect.
What is an example of the evolutionary theory of government?
Tribal communities are good examples of evolutionary theory of government, because the family unit is often important but overseen by a leader. A biblical example is the 12 tribes of Jacob because the head of the family formed the larger government. Each tribe was headed by one of Jacobs son, and Jacob ruled over them all.
What do you think of Wallace's critique of lamarcks?
he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist
What do you think of Wallace's critique of lamarcks hypotheses?
he was different because lamarck was using already true things to prove something and wallace was a theorist
Which of lamarcks ideas was later found to be incorrect?
The idea of acquired characteristics. For instance. The idea that a blacksmith, who would develop enormous muscles due to his trade, could pass these physical attributes on to his children.
What is the current theory of evolution?
That is a very hard question to answer as the "Theory of Evolution" is really an umbrella term for several theories based on the fact that allele frequencies of populations change over time, and the assumption that they have done so for the entirety of life on earth, as well as continuing on into the future. Evolution does NOT claim that there is no God. It makes NO STATEMENT whatsoever about spiritual matters. In fact, statistically speaking, the majority of the people who accept evolution are christians. It also does NOT include big-bang cosmology, does not require a multi-billion year-old earth, and does NOT address the origin of life at all, only its' variety. Current evolutionary theory can be traced to the moment when Darwin proposed his theory on the mechanics of evolution which overturned the previously held view proposed by LaMarck. LaMarcks theory of evolution proposed that an animal gains a trait in its' lifetime and then passes it on. Darwins theory replaced LaMarcks theory by proposing that changes were inherited, but not acquired during the lifetime of the individual. He attributed these changes to random mutations present from birth. Darwin did not stop with a mechanism for these changes, he also divised the "theory of Natural Selection" as a mechanism to favor beneficial mutations. Later, he proposed his "theory of Common Descent" as an explanation of the current variety we see in life. This theory proposes that at some point in the distant past, all living things share a common ancestor. Darwins three ideas have been confirmed through genetics, phylogenics, taxonomy, and paleontology, as well as being supported by every branch of science which can address biology. Through more discoveries, other scientists have developed even more specific theories based on evolution such as, "punctuated equilibrium", "evo-devo", and even the "Out of Africa" theory of human origins. The more we understand about the history of life, the more theories will be developed, but they are all part of evolutionary theory.
