Chaucer's description of church officials in "The Canterbury Tales" is surprising because he presents them as flawed and corrupt individuals, directly challenging the traditional perception of clergy as righteous and virtuous. Instead, Chaucer's clergy are depicted as greedy, hypocritical, and morally compromised, highlighting the corruption within the church during his time.
Clergy were the Church officials, and the laity were the regular members.
The appointment of church officials by kings and nobles rather than by church officials apex
Geoffrey Chaucer was a Christian and was a member of the Church of England. He is often described as having held traditional Christian beliefs.
Church officials in the past have been very powerful because of the free reign that was given to them. Church officials have long been able to scare t heir congregations into doing their bidding.
Synod
Clergy
simony
he criticized the sacrements of the church and that the officials were corrupt because they thought they were the only ones who could read Scriptures
That depends on which country you are referring to. In Constantinople, the Emperor would chose high-ranking church officials, until the end of the Byzantine Empire. In England, the king or queen still officially appoints the high-ranking church officials in Britain.
by the wars ?
england
they where called lords