What is the difference between a formal art critique and someone's opinion of a art work?

Answer 1

A formal art critique is centered around the concrete aspects of art. For example, a critique may focus on the time in which the piece was made, circumstances in the artist's life, specific genres, choice of materials, function (if applicable) and the message behind the art.

An opinion will often operate from the likes/dislikes of the individual and has more room for abstractions. Ones personal preferences and instinctual reaction toward a piece of art cannot be argued or discounted.

There is a third element that falls in between opinion and critique and that has to do with the analysis of an artist's life. The temptation to psychoanalyze dead iconic artists are often too strong to turn down. Some curators have attributed Pablo Picasso's 'blue period' to a period of sadness. Others believe that he was just trying a different style.

Answer 2

A formal critique will describe why the critic liked or disliked a work of art.

Answer 3

A formal art critique typically involves a systematic analysis of the artwork based on elements like composition, technique, and historical context, while an opinion is more subjective and based on personal preferences or emotional responses to the artwork. Critiques often draw on art theory and art history to provide a deeper understanding of the artwork.