Which is better JK Rowling or Jacqueline Wilson?

Answer 1

It depends on the type of person you are. Twilight has a good plot but is kind of bland while The Host is amazing! In twilight, Bella has the emotional range of a tea spoon! Don't get me wrong, i like Twilight but The Host is better.

Harry Potter is brillant. It has a detailed and interesting plot that makes you want to read on with very in depth characters. As a person, I would als say Jo is better. Stephenie Meyer goes around saying things like she's better than Shakespeare and acting very vain. JK Rowling lost her status as a billionaire because she gave so much money as charity.

I'm going to have to go with Johanna Rowling. Katherine isn't her middle name but in fact her grandmother's name

Answer 2

It all depends on opinion. I like both. Some people might like Rick Riordan better because he's more realistic or many other reasons. Some like JK Rowling better because she is more imaginative and things like that. They both have their good and bad points and I admire them both.

Answer 3

J.K Rowling.

The Harry Potter series has sold over 400 million copies (June 2008) and the Twilight series just 100 million (March 2010).

As you can see there is quite a difference between the two dates so Harry Potter will probably have sold even more.

It was estimated that Stephanie Meyers net worth in 2008 was 134 Mil, where as J.K. Rowling is the first ever self-made Billionaire author and she is richer than the UK Queen.

Answer 4

Both J.K. Rowling and Jacqueline Wilson are highly successful authors in their own right, each with their own unique style and fan base. J.K. Rowling is known for the globally popular "Harry Potter" series, while Jacqueline Wilson is known for her diverse range of Children's Books that often touch on sensitive topics. Ultimately, the "better" author would depend on personal preference and what type of storytelling resonates more with the individual reader.

Answer 5

They write quite different genres, don't you think so?