Ross questions the conclusion that the grooms committed the murder because he believes there isn't enough evidence to prove their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He argues that the evidence presented is circumstantial and could point to other potential suspects. Ross wants to ensure that the correct individuals are held accountable for the crime.
He asks where Macbeth was and what he was doing.
He asks where Macbeth was and what he was doing.
He asks where Macbeth was and what he was doing.
Macbeth figured that if the grooms were allowed to speak, they would deny any involvement in the murder of Duncan, and this would cause people to look elsewhere for his murderer. As it is, nobody (except Macduff) seriously doubts that the grooms were the killers.
Do you mean, "Who was accused of murdering Duncan"? The grooms in Duncan's chamber, for a start. Then Malcolm and Donalbain were accused of paying the grooms to commit the murder.
Yes.
A murder can only be committed once.
The one who claims someone has committed a murder is an accuser or possibly a witness.
I went to school with this girl and was working and the Plano Police Dept during her murder. I was just talking with a friend about this murder and wondered if there is anything new???? who is posting this question..??? As I remember the police "knew" who committed this murder
No, she never commited a murder.
No he hasn't committed murder.
Macbeth and his wife plan to blame the guards for killing the King. Indeed, after the murder, Macbeth slays them both claiming that they had commited the deed. Almost immediately, however, the sons of Duncan (Malcolm and Donalbain) decide to flee since they fear that they will be suspected of either killing their father or hiring the killer. Later, it is discussed that they are suspects, but it is also made clear that most people recognize that it's really Macbeth who has done it.