Yes, "owner-occupied" is hyphenated when used as a compound adjective before a noun, such as in "owner-occupied property." The hyphen helps clarify that the owner resides in the property. However, when used as a predicate, such as "The property is owner occupied," it is typically not hyphenated.
Yes, "part-owner" is hyphenated when used as a compound noun to describe someone who owns part of something. The hyphen helps clarify that "part" modifies "owner." However, if used as a descriptive phrase (e.g., "She is a part owner of the business"), it can be written without the hyphen.
The term used as a descriptive term (adjunct) should be hyphenated (one-owner) but usually is not.
Either way: part-owner or part owner seems acceptable (but the spell checker here at WikiAnswers does not like the hyphenated version!)
No! If you looked this up then your favorite color must be blue. I am a psychic
home grown deep fried
Yes, "stay-at-home mom" is hyphenated. The hyphens connect the words "stay," "at," and "home" to function as a single adjective describing the noun "mom." This format clarifies that the mom stays at home rather than implying she is merely a mom who stays at home occasionally.
it can be any type of compound word it can be closed ex:homerun or open ex: home run or hyphenated ex:home-run not so much hyphenated but it can be either closed or open :) hoped it help
Yes, you do. "Stay-at-home" is hyphenated, but "mother" does not have to be. Either version is grammatically correct.
It is not hyphenated.
No it's not hyphenated.
Motorcycle is not hyphenated