Twin Turbo.
turbo gives more hp then a supercharger
You can not get a turbo kit but there is a nuespeed Supercharger kit for the 2.0 it gives you 50% more horsepower and 55% more torque.
That depends on what you are wanting. A turbo is more efficient but has a delay (lag) on accel. A supercharger does not have any delay, but is not as efficient.
Using a compressor in the form a turbo or supercharger to force air into an engine to make more power.
a turbocharger. unless you are comparing a turbo kit to DIY supercharging. See what is available for your car. Turbo kits are more elaborate, but if you cant find a supercharger kit, you will have an easier time buying and installing the turbo kit that making a supercharger setup yourself.
I would say that for more power and efficiency, you should go with the twin turbo.
supercharger or turbo system. if those arent in the budget, look into CAI, headers, Exhaust system, performance module (superchips programmer) etc....
Yes. The best way to do it is to feed the air coming off the turbo into the intake of the supercharger. Then off the supercharger into the intake. You can have one or more intecoolers. This setup is called Twincharged
Because of the advancements in turbo technology, A turbo system is what I would recommend. It is more flexible, easier to upgrade later and more efficient than a supercharger. Depending on how big you go, it could give you better low/mid range torque for a wider powerband.
The turbo uses exhaust gas the spin up the turbine in order to compress more air into the combustion chamber for more power while the supercharger uses serpentine belt driven from the crankshaft to spin up the turbine.
Simple question, but not so simple to answer. If you are talking about upgrading your car, you may not have much of a choice. Many cars have only one type of kit available, usually because its more popular for that car. For example, there are many turbo kits for a Nissan z, and virtually no supercharger kits. Conversely, there are many supercharger kits for the ford mustang and very few turbo kits. Mechanically a supercharger is simpler. It uses energy from the drive belt to compress air into the engine intake. The faster the engine spins, the more pressure there is on the intake. A turbocharger does the same thing, but instead of using a belt to connect to the engine, the turbo uses exhaust pressure to drive the compressor. For raw performance, a supercharger is better. It can add more power than a turbo and the power is available through more of the rev range. Adding a supercharger will significantly decrease your fuel economy, however. In addition, a supercharger may wear out your engine faster. A turbo, when driven normally, will not decrease fuel efficiency at all (and on highways can actually IMPROVE fuel efficiency). The disadvantage of a turbo is that you really only get a power boost in the high revs (4000 or more for most turbos). The bigger the turbo, the higher you have to rev for it to kick in. Because of this, turbos are better suited to manual transmissions, so you can shift down and keep the engine in the "turbo sweet spot". Nothing is more frustrating than putting your foot down in an automatic turbo and waiting for the transmission to shift down so you can go. The BOTTOM LINE is that turbos deliver better efficiency and plenty of power, but for raw performance, superchargers usually go farther, especially with automatic transmissions.
It Depends on how much more Horsepower you want. If you want alot more horsepower go with the Turbo,but if you want a little go with the supercharger. If you want to install a turbo you going to have to do little engine work to prevent your engine from blowing, installing a turbo can be expensive. Installing a supercharger doesn't need to much engine work, but can be cheaper than a turbo. It all depends how much time and money you want to spend.