Durable property is typically classified as assets that have a long lifespan and are used in production or service delivery. Among the options provided, tools used for vehicle fuel would likely be considered durable property due to their longevity and functional purpose in the maintenance and operation of vehicles. In contrast, buildings are also classified as durable property, as they have a long-term existence and are fundamental to various business operations. Both tools and buildings qualify, but buildings are generally viewed as more significant durable property.
With permission of the owner of the vehicle and the property, you could do so without legal consequences. However, if you did something to damage that vehicle or caused damage to property with that vehicle, insurance would reject the claim.
They are not classified as a vehicle at all. They have no motor so are classified in the trailer group.
A vehicle is classified as a tangible personal property type. This category includes movable items that are not affixed to real estate, such as cars, trucks, motorcycles, and other forms of transportation. Unlike real property, which refers to land and buildings, vehicles are typically subject to registration, licensing, and depreciation.
No
Vehicle Assembly Building was created in 1966.
Yes. The lienholder is the rightful owner of the vehicle, and a repossessor can collect the vehicle on any publicly accessible property, so long as they don't break into a building, crossed a lock gate, and their actions fall within the guidelines of peaceful repossession.
First question: Yes, they can come on private property, with some limitations. They may not enter an enclosed building or cross a locked gate. Second question: Unless they gain consent of the owner of that vehicle, they cannot enter or move any other vehicle in order to get to the vehicle they're repossessing.
That one could go both ways. If you have collision coverage on the vehicle, it could be covered as part of the tow expense. However, your liability coverage is responsible for repairing the claimant's building.....and that would include removing the vehicle from their building!
You sure can! The only thing you have to prove is that the property (either the land or the building) forced you to drive on it and then made you get into an accident and if the owner knew the property was going to do this and did not prevent it they could be "negligent". So for example, you are driving down the street and the land moved one of its buildings into the street forcing you to drive onto the property where you had the accident and you then struck a different building on that property, and the owner new the land was going to do this and that the building was planning on causing your vehicle damage, but then chose to do nothing about it you could sue them.
yes
A vehicle that can fly
The part one crimes are divided into violent and property crimes. Aggravated assault, forcible rape, murder, and robbery are classified as violent. Arson, burglary, larceny(theft), and motor vehicle theft are classified as property crimes. Part II crimes are tracked, but much less specifically.