In most states a BAC level is not proof of intoxication in any case. It normally creates a 'rebuttable presumption' of impairment. Essentially that means that the court has decided that MOST people are impaired at .xx bac, but you have the opportunity to prove (somehow) that you were not impaired. A BAC may also not be available for many reasons, ranging from the defendant refusing to take a breath test to a breath analyzer that fails to work or is improperly certified. The arrest would not have been (or should not have been made) unless the officer had enough evidence before he made the arrest to prove his case, because people often refuse a BAC test after calling their attorney from the jail. What this means is that a BAC/Intoxilyzer test is only one piece or evidence for the trial, and a cop who looses a DUI case because he doesn't have a BAC reading did an awful lot of things wrong.
you go to a cite and look it up
cite textual means quote proof taken directly from a passage. :)
No. Let the police do that.
No. Police officers are paid an hourly wage or flat salary. They do NOT get a "commission" on fines that are levied on persons they arrest or cite.
What is Cite
Cite the reference carefully. He will cite the professor's article in his report.
The past tense of cite is cited.
i have found a site to cite
since encyclopidias and dictionaries do not provide bylines, how do you cite?
CITE-FM was created in 1977.
No, it is not plagiarism if you properly cite your sources.
If you use direct information from the syllabus, you must cite it