History can be both reliable and unreliable, depending on the sources and the methods used to interpret events. Primary sources, such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts, can provide valuable insights but may also reflect biases or incomplete perspectives. Historians strive to analyze multiple sources and contexts to create a more accurate narrative, yet interpretations can vary based on new evidence or shifting societal values. Ultimately, while history offers important lessons, it requires critical examination to understand its complexities.
tru or false ? we are fortunate to have much reliable information about homer and his history??
It depends on what you are researching on. I have found that museum websites are very useful eg (uk) the imperial war museum webiste. the bbc history website is also reliable, but only reflects British history.
If you are interested in checking the vehicle vin history then the most reliable source would be to head over to www.carfax.com . They are a reliable source used by many.
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
The most reliable home security system is considered to be ADT. This company has a long history of security and safety.
Questions about Shakespeare's work. It is not a reliable reference for history or the lifestyle and customs of the late Elizabethan period.
I would use Carfax. They are reliable and have a history of honest business practices. Instavin is questionable.
By questioning weather there source are reliable. (APEX)
The principal and most reliable one was Herodotos of Halicarnassos.
John Deere. History of reliable products second to none in the industry!
Dividend history is important especially for stock investing. Without knowing the dividend history for a company, you will never know if the company will be reliable to pay the dividend every quarter.
1 Kings and 2 Kings are part of the series now known as the Deuteronomic History and are moderately reliable in their history. The Deuteronomic History consists of Joshua, Judges, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Kings and 2 Kings.1 Chronicles and 2 Chronicles are also considered history books, but are possibly less reliable than the Deuteronomic History on which they are based, because that original source was amended without reliance on any other known source.