That depends on the make, model and age of the car, where you are in the world and what deal you can get in your area, ask the question again with these details included.
No, rear brake pads do not typically wear faster than front brake pads. The front brake pads usually wear out faster because they handle a larger portion of the braking force.
Rear brake pads wear faster than front brake pads because the front brakes handle more of the braking force, which means they wear down the pads more slowly.
If you need to replace the discs or calipers your costs will rise accordingly. You can ... The rear brake pads should last twice as long as the front disc pads.
brake pads can either be on the front or rear of a car... it all depends on if it has disc or drum brakes on the rear... drum brakes have shoes not pads
How do you change the front and rear brake pads on a 2000 Honda Civic Si?
Front brake pads typically wear faster than rear brake pads due to the distribution of weight and the fact that the front brakes handle a larger portion of the braking force.
Around $500 for front and rear brakes
$600-700 for new rotors and pads, front and rear.
You can buy front brake pads from Auto Zone the cheapest are $12.99 and the most expensive are $49.99. The rear brake pads range from $15.99 to $49.99.
No. The front and rear brake pads are not interchangeable on a 2005 Jeep.
Its got disc brakes in the front, therefor brake pads and its got drum brakes in the back, therefor brake shoes
FRONT OR REAR?