In urban (or city) driving , there is a lot of stop and go traffic. Each time you slow the car down, gas us used inefficiently, then you must accelerate again to get up to traffic speed again. In rural driving, it is mostly highway driving where consistent speeds are attained there fore providing the best energy efficiency.
No
Fighting performance?.. Eurofighter is better But in fuel consumption and economy F-16 is better F-16D .. fuel consumption 1.05km/litre Eurofighter.. fuel consumption 0.7km/litre F-16 max gload 9g Eurofighter max gload 9+ Its more expensive to own the Eurofighter.. but it performs better than the F-16
The fuel consumption of an Airbus A350 varies depending on the model and operational conditions, but on average, it typically consumes about 2.5 to 3.1 liters of fuel per kilometer flown. This translates to approximately 15 to 20% better fuel efficiency compared to older aircraft in its class. The A350's advanced aerodynamics and efficient engines contribute significantly to its lower fuel consumption. Overall, it is designed for long-haul flights with a focus on sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
It's not usually better than about 12l/100km.
Normally the larger the engine the more fuel it will use under the same conditions.
The 1988 Volvo 240 typically has a fuel consumption rate of around 18-25 miles per gallon (mpg), depending on the specific model and driving conditions. The fuel efficiency can vary based on factors such as engine size, transmission type, and whether the vehicle is driven in city or highway conditions. Generally, the 2.3-liter inline-four engine offers better fuel economy compared to the larger engines available in that year.
The Mazda CX-9 generally offers better fuel consumption compared to the GMC Yukon. The CX-9 typically achieves around 22-28 miles per gallon, depending on driving conditions, while the Yukon, being a larger SUV with a more powerful engine, averages around 15-20 miles per gallon. If fuel efficiency is a primary concern, the Mazda CX-9 is the better choice.
The consumption of lubricating oil for a diesel engine depends on the operating conditions and the design of the engine. There are some averages depending on the year of the engine. Pre 1980's engine are around 25% of fuel consumption. Pre 1990 engines are around 20% of fuel consumption and more recently built diesel engines are around 1% of fuel consumption.
The fuel consumption of the Caterpillar 303.5 CR mini excavator typically ranges from approximately 1.5 to 3.0 gallons per hour, depending on factors such as operating conditions, load, and usage patterns. This model is designed for efficiency, allowing for optimal performance while minimizing fuel use. Actual consumption may vary based on specific job site conditions and operator habits. For precise fuel consumption metrics, it's best to refer to the manufacturer's specifications or consult with a dealer.
The hourly fuel consumption of a Caterpillar 307 excavator typically ranges from about 2.5 to 4.5 gallons per hour, depending on factors such as the load, work conditions, and operator efficiency. It's essential to consider that actual fuel usage can vary based on specific job site conditions and machine maintenance. For the most accurate information, refer to the manufacturer's specifications or monitor fuel consumption during operation.
The fuel consumption of the Perkins diesel engine 1106D typically ranges from 180 to 220 grams per kilowatt-hour (g/kWh) under full load conditions. However, actual fuel consumption can vary based on specific application, load, and operating conditions. For precise figures, it's advisable to consult the engine's technical manual or manufacturer specifications.
better aerodynamics(better fuel consumption, MPG) and crash test ratings.