yes they are recessive
No. They are both recessive meaning that both parents must have the gene for either blue or green.
Brown eye color is dominant, while blue, green, and hazel eye colors are recessive. This means that brown eyes are more likely to be expressed if an individual inherits one brown-eyed allele and one allele for a different eye color.
There are no such things as dominant and recessive genes. There are only dominant and recessive alleles. Dominant alleles are parts of a gene that present its features over the recessive allele, which is the one that is always masked by the dominant allele. The recessive allele's trait only shows if both of the alleles in a trait are recessive.
Homozygous refers to having two identical alleles for a particular gene, either dominant or recessive, while heterozygous refers to having two different alleles for a particular gene. For example, in a homozygous dominant individual, both alleles for a gene are dominant, whereas in a heterozygous individual, one allele is dominant and the other is recessive.
A dominant trait occurs when either both alleles are dominant or one allele is dominant and the other is recessive. This is because a dominant allele overpowers a recessive allele. In order to have a recessive trait both alleles must be recessive.
With brown eyes, they are recessive.
recessive
Brown eyes are dominant. That's why more people have brown eyes then hazel or blue or green.
Brown Eyes are Dominant, Blue Eyes are recessive, Green Eyes are Dominant over Blue and Recessive to Brown Eyes, Same for Hazel. ACTUALLY!!!!...Green Eyes are more recessive than any eye color including Blue Only 2% of the Worlds Population have them! WRONG!!!!... Green Eyes ARE dominant over blue. It's just that the Green Eye trait is more rare.
Yes, green eye color is typically considered a rare trait that is usually inherited as a recessive genetic trait. Individuals with green eyes often have two copies of the recessive allele for eye color.
Its unlikely because green eyes are dominant, and blue eyes are recessive. It is still possible, but highly unlikely.
No. They are both recessive meaning that both parents must have the gene for either blue or green.
Each parent has a set of genes that is passed on to his/her offspring (children) and which genes become apparent in the child is all dependent on whichever genes are dominant over the recessive genes. For example, one parent may have blue eyes (dominant) and another has green eyes (recessive); it is more likely that the child will have blue eyes than green eyes*. *This example was merely for explanation; I don't know if blue eyes are dominant over green eyes or not.
Each parent has a set of genes that is passed on to his/her offspring (children) and which genes become apparent in the child is all dependent on whichever genes are dominant over the recessive genes. For example, one parent may have blue eyes (dominant) and another has green eyes (recessive); it is more likely that the child will have blue eyes than green eyes*. *This example was merely for explanation; I don't know if blue eyes are dominant over green eyes or not.
Depends on what organism, "green" cannot simply be dominant or recessive, it needs to be put in context of some form or organism - for example: are green eyes dominant over blue eyes in humans, or is green foliage dominant over grey foliage in cacti.
Brown eye color is dominant, while blue, green, and hazel eye colors are recessive. This means that brown eyes are more likely to be expressed if an individual inherits one brown-eyed allele and one allele for a different eye color.
I assume you mean the mother has a dominant allele for some other color. Father is homozygous recessive for blue. Dominant allele + recessive blue X recessive blue + recessive blue The baby has a 50% chance of blue eyes and a 50% chance of getting the dominant colored eyes.