Sure ... just find real evidence.
Scientific method
Evolution is as logical as you can get. Supported by concrete evidence, corroborated by scientists worldwide, and put through the scientific method time and time again... it does not deviate into a subjective opinion. Those who don't believe the theory of evolution is logical clearly do not understand evolution.
Yes, evolution can be tested using the scientific method. Scientists can observe and study patterns of variation in living organisms, collect data on inheritance and genetic changes over generations, and make predictions about future changes based on these observations. These predictions can then be tested through additional observations and experiments, allowing for the validation or refinement of evolutionary theories.
Absolutely. There aren't many scientists today that do not accept the theory of evolution, but yet many, many of them are religious.The group of people 'claiming' that evolution cannot coexist with religion are religious fanatics & evolutionist devotee's. Do not mind them.
Evolution does NOT involve creationism.Evolution is a testable and therefore provable explanation as to how the diversity of life on earth has happened.Creationism is a religious viewpoint and therefore a mater of faith.AnswerI agree with the above. Evolution does NOT involve Creationism. Evolution is a branch of biological science and thus rejects "supernatural" claims such as those of Creationism, does not need to consider them. Creationism, often hanging on Genesis, the first book of the Bible, predates scientific inquiry and the scientific method and so is thus rejected by science and thus evolutionary science. In the public spotlight, the so-called Evolution-Creation "controversy" and all the on-stage arguments and debates might make it seem as though Evolution and Creationism (and Intelligent Design) have a lot to do with one another, but I doubt Creationism gets much mention at all in scientific laboratories and scientific conferences (it can't because it hasn't got anything to say about the real world.)
They are both based on the scientific method.
. . . those who interpreted The Bible literally as "The Historical Truth," and those who believed in the demonstrated "Scientific Method" of evolution.
what is the significance of scientific method?what is the significance of scientific method?
Answer :Scientific Method
The scientific method and hypothesis are critical to science because when scientists test out a certain theory they need a format to be able to test it out. Without the scientific method, scientists wouldn't be able to test out theories and do certain projects.
Yes, because it helps the judges judge the project.(project is also graded on neatness) And also, without them being in order, it is not the scientific method.
No, you have to go through college and get the degree first......... Nah just kidding, yes you can practice the Scientific Method even without being a scientist. (:
scientific method
Scientific method is a systematic approach to problem solving.
The scientific method is a fixed procedure of investigating what lacks reliability. Scientists only believe in what is proven, not what is believed without any evidence of research or results. This fact of the scientific method makes it useful in all areas as we only should believe in what is proven to be the truth and not what we believe is the truth. The scientific method is precise, transparent and the results of scientific investigations are reliable.
The world would really be boring without the scientific methods. Scientific methods have been able to solve a number of problems that we face on our day to day lives.
You just did. Just change "the word scientific method..." to "the TERM scientific method". Or you could say "That's not following the scientific method."