I believe yes because prokaryotic cells can go without oxygen so maybe they can survive without it
Plant and animal cells are both eukaryotes. However, some animal cells may be prokaryotes, like red blood cells. RBC do not have nucleus. They are considered prokaryotes, so they do not live long.
Plants and animals are classified as eukaryotes (true nucleus with nuclear membrane). These cells do not have prokaryotic cells lodged in them. while describing the evolution of mitochondria and chloroplast, we say that these may have once been free living prokaryotic cells that were engulfed into the eukaryotic cells. There is evidence that the mitochondrial and chloroplast genome has structure similar to that of the prokaryotes. The ribosomes and the RNA types produced are also typical of prokaryotes. The fact that the organelles have double membranes also suggests being absorbed by a larger cell. However, even if they were their own cells at one time, they have degenerated into only organelles. Thus plants and animal cells do not have prokaryotic cells.
Yes, prokaryotic cells have the ability to live in a wide variety of habitats, including extreme environments like hot springs, deep sea vents, and acidic environments. They are highly adaptable and can thrive in locations where other organisms may struggle to survive.
Ribosomes are responsible for one of the most fundamental processes required for cells to live. Without ribsomes, they couldn't translate the genetic code into proteins which can carry out reactions that do not occur spontaneously (i.e. without a little "encouraging push").Hence, all cells contain ribosomes. In fact, we only know two major categories of ribosomes - 80S and 70S ribosomes. 80S are larger and found in eukaryote cells (yeast, fungi, animals, plants), while 70S are smaller and found in prokaryotes (archaea, bacteria - but also mitochondria and plastids inside eukaryotes! This is a strong argument in favour of the "endosymbiont theory").
Oxygen and nutrients are two things that the blood drops off to cells for them to live and function properly. Oxygen is essential for cellular respiration, while nutrients provide energy and building blocks for cellular processes.
No. It is eukaryotic because it is in the protist kingdom. All protists live in moist areas and are eukaryotic.
Firstly, archae are not a kingdom but a domain. A domain comes before kingdoms in the taxonomic classification system 3 domains are Eukaryae, Prokaryae and Archae. As you can see from their names, the domain Eukaryae is eukaryotic and the domain Prokaryae is prokaryotic. Archae are different. They are bacteria which live in extreme conditions such as extremely high temperatures, with little oxygen or water, etc. Archae are neither prokaryotic or eukaryotic.
Most Eukaryotic cell need oxygen to live .
Ribosomes are found in both eukaryotic cells (in the cytoplasm and on the endoplasmic reticulum) and prokaryotic cells (free-floating in the cytoplasm). They are responsible for protein synthesis in the cell.
Plant and animal cells are both eukaryotes. However, some animal cells may be prokaryotes, like red blood cells. RBC do not have nucleus. They are considered prokaryotes, so they do not live long.
A Animal Cell is both a Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Cell. The Blood cells have no nucleus so they are considered Prokaryotic. That is also why they cannot divide and they do not live very long. The other cells are all Eukaryotic.Added:The above is totally wrong. Red blood cells may have no nucleus, as they mature to not have one, but they are still eukaryotic cells and all animal cells are eukaryotic.
No. Eukaryotes (protists, plants, animals) are an animal cell. A prokaryotic cell just live. They don't feel or see anything. That's why we get sick. They're just trying to survive.
Plants and animals are classified as eukaryotes (true nucleus with nuclear membrane). These cells do not have prokaryotic cells lodged in them. while describing the evolution of mitochondria and chloroplast, we say that these may have once been free living prokaryotic cells that were engulfed into the eukaryotic cells. There is evidence that the mitochondrial and chloroplast genome has structure similar to that of the prokaryotes. The ribosomes and the RNA types produced are also typical of prokaryotes. The fact that the organelles have double membranes also suggests being absorbed by a larger cell. However, even if they were their own cells at one time, they have degenerated into only organelles. Thus plants and animal cells do not have prokaryotic cells.
in eukaryotic chromosomes it produces DNA to live and in prokaryotic chromosomes it is nothing but bacteria.
Well, mitochondria swam in what eventually became our eukaryotic cells billions of years ago and have there own DNA,RNA which means they're quite separate from us. They have a symboitic relationship with us, and we completely depend on them for oxygen
Some parasites are prokaryotic (bacteria), and some are eukaryotic (helminths, protozoans...)
To all of the other cells of your body that need oxygen to live.