No. One of the largest phenomenons in genetics and Biology is the C-value paradox: organisms such as flies may have significantly more DNA than animals as large as elephants. There is absolutely no correlation between the size of an animal and the amount of DNA it has in its genome. This is due to varying amounts of repeating and "nonsense" DNA present in any given species' genome.
Unless you are talking about the physical size of an organism's DNA, in which case all organisms have DNA made from the same nucleotide subunits which maintain the same size throughout all of creation. What changes is the amount of nucleotides, and therefore the size of the genome.
Yes, organisms make more cells as they grow larger through a process called cell division. During cell division, a cell replicates its DNA and divides into two daughter cells, allowing the organism to increase in size and maintain its body functions.
Growth hormones primarily signal for cells to grow larger and divide, which can result in overall tissue growth. They do not directly cause cells to shrink or decrease in size.
It takes less cells to do the job. If you cut yourself, then your body can send less cells to heal the wound compared to when the cells are smaller. You need more cells when you are smaller then when you have the larger cells.
Dinosaurs had cells similar in size to modern-day animals like us. The size of cells doesn't change much across species, but the number of cells in an organism can vary greatly. For example, ants have smaller bodies with more cells compared to us, which is why they are much smaller in size.
New cells come from cell division, where existing cells replicate and divide to create more cells as an organism grows.
Because all cells are roughly the same size. This means that bigger animals are made of more cells than smaller animals. (If bigger animals had the same number of cells as smaller animals then the cells they were made of would have to be bigger in proportion to those that smaller animals were made of - and they are not)
Bigger animals are bigger because they have more cells not bigger cells. You would think that this would be so, but cells can only function up to a certain size. So, no, they are not.
Girrafe is an eukaryotic organism while bacteria is procaryotic. As we know that eukaryotic organism has larger cells than prokaryotic organism so girrafe has larger cells than a bacterium.
More than one. The way of looking at it that most cells are the same size and therefore the bigger the multi cellular organism, the more cells there are in its makeup.
A larger dog may have MORE cells than a smaller dog but they are not bigger.
The lion simply has more cells in its body; they're not any bigger or smaller.
Yes, organisms make more cells as they grow larger through a process called cell division. During cell division, a cell replicates its DNA and divides into two daughter cells, allowing the organism to increase in size and maintain its body functions.
To answer this question as it is written: not necessarily. An organism (bacterium) can be smaller than tissue (the cartilage in my ears). By definition, an organism is more COMPLEX than a tissue, but not necessarily bigger.
More than one. The way of looking at it that most cells are the same size and therefore the bigger the multi cellular organism, the more cells there are in its makeup.
There are many reasons why cells divide. Here are some of them:* Growth - More cells=bigger organism * Repair - Colon and skin cells, for example, have to be constantly replaced as they are scraped off
Yes, beacause a squirrel is alot smaller than a bear. The bigger the animal, the more the cells. Submited by a kid..... WOW
Growth hormones primarily signal for cells to grow larger and divide, which can result in overall tissue growth. They do not directly cause cells to shrink or decrease in size.