yes it does affect living things especially the plants because if it is not the appropriate kind of soil for the plant the plant will surely get low amount of nutrients from the soil.
environment
The non living environment provides nutrition and protection for living things.
An ecosystem consists of living (biotic) and non-living (abiotic) components interacting with each other. Living things such as plants and animals depend on non-living things like sunlight, water, and soil for survival within the ecosystem.
Soil degradation can negatively impact living organisms by reducing the availability of nutrients and water in the soil, leading to decreased growth and productivity of plants. It can also disrupt soil microbiota, affecting nutrient cycling and soil health. Additionally, soil degradation can result in the loss of habitat for soil-dwelling organisms, impacting biodiversity.
The concept that living things can arise from non-living things is known as abiogenesis. This theory suggests that the conditions on early Earth allowed for the formation of simple organic molecules, which eventually led to the development of more complex biological systems. While the exact mechanisms of abiogenesis are still debated, it is thought to have played a crucial role in the origins of life on our planet.
Living things can help prevent erosion by stabilizing soil with their root systems, as well as by creating barriers that break the force of wind and water. However, overgrazing or deforestation can lead to increased erosion by removing vegetation that holds the soil in place. Ultimately, the impact of living things on erosion depends on how they interact with their environment.
Soil doesnt live but things in it lives(plants seeds etc.)
it decomposes soil by breaking dead things down
because plants use the soil and the plant puts other things in the soil
what about soil are you asking about? In terms of texture earthworms and organic matter can affect it. In terms of acidity soil particle size and acid rain can affect it.
soil can not be both biotic,or abiotic. Because "biotic" means "living,or alive" And abiotic means "dead,or not alive" Therefore,soil can only be "abiotic" because it's not living.wrong because soil can be both because what lives in the soil (bacteria,ants,and ect...) are living things meaning that the bacteria ants and ect.. are living things but even though soil is abiotic what makes it both is that there are ;iving things inside the soil so that's why it is both biotic and abiotic
living: plants, animals etc. non-living: soil
Soil is very alive. It has a lot of living things in it.
No, decomposers are living things, like fungi and bacteria. Soil usually contains living things, but it is mostly non-living.
Weathering and erosion can impact living things by altering their habitat. Excessive erosion can remove protective vegetation, leading to habitat loss for plants and animals. Weathering can also change soil composition and nutrient availability, which can affect the survival and growth of organisms.
The soil needs earthworms to keep them healthy
releases water and soil